Literature DB >> 11093568

Routine, single-item screening to identify abusive relationships in women.

J H Wasson1, A M Jette, J Anderson, D J Johnson, E C Nelson, C M Kilo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Abusive relationships are associated with several demographic factors and many clinical problems in women. However, practices often do not screen for abuse.
METHODS: This is a descriptive study of 1526 women aged 19 to 69 years who completed a health survey in 31 office practices. The 53-item survey included a question designed to screen for an abusive relationship. Our analysis compared self-reported measures of symptoms (N = 13) and functional limitations (n = 6) of women who had abusive relationships with those who did not. We also examined the utility of using a constellation of clinical problems to identify risk for abuse.
RESULTS: Women in abusive relationships were more likely to be poor (37% vs 14%; P < .001) and young (87% were younger than 51 years versus 69% of those who were not in such relationships; P < .001). They had twice as many bothersome symptoms (3.1 vs 1.7; P < .001) and functional problems (1.6 vs 0.8; P < .001). Approximately 40% (36/89) of low-income women with emotional problems were at risk for abuse versus only 6% (64/1025) of women with adequate financial resources and no emotional problems. However, because so many women were at low risk, almost twice as many in this group (n = 64) reported abusive relationships than in the high-risk group (n = 36).
CONCLUSIONS: Women in abusive relationships have many symptoms and functional limitations. However, symptoms and clinical problems provide insufficient clues for abuse. It is better just to ask. A single-item screening question appears adequate for this purpose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11093568

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Pract        ISSN: 0094-3509            Impact factor:   0.493


  7 in total

1.  Practising sound medicine in the absence of evidence.

Authors:  Fiona Kouyoumdjian; Vanessa L Cardy
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-03-02       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Screening for elder mistreatment in emergency departments: current progress and recommendations for next steps.

Authors:  Tony Rosen; Timothy F Platts-Mills; Terry Fulmer
Journal:  J Elder Abuse Negl       Date:  2020-06

3.  Screening for elder mistreatment in dental and medical clinics.

Authors:  Terry Fulmer; Shiela Strauss; Stefanie L Russell; Geetika Singh; Jamie Blankenship; Roja Vemula; Billy Caceres; Michael Valenti; David Sutin
Journal:  Gerodontology       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Applying surveillance and screening to family psychosocial issues: implications for the medical home.

Authors:  Arvin Garg; Paul H Dworkin
Journal:  J Dev Behav Pediatr       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.225

Review 5.  Intimate partner violence screening tools: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rebecca F Rabin; Jacky M Jennings; Jacquelyn C Campbell; Megan H Bair-Merritt
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Facilitators and barriers to routine intimate partner violence screening in antenatal care settings in Uganda.

Authors:  Ronald Anguzu; Laura D Cassidy; Kirsten M M Beyer; Harriet M Babikako; Rebekah J Walker; Julia Dickson-Gomez
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Addressing domestic violence in primary care: what the physician needs to know.

Authors:  Jinan Usta; Rim Taleb
Journal:  Libyan J Med       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 1.743

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.