Literature DB >> 11093017

Approximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure.

D B Svanaes1, A Moystad, T A Larheim.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To study whether caries-specific enhancement of storage phosphor images might improve the observer performance of approximal caries depth assessments compared with film radiography.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 120 exposures were made of 120 extracted human teeth. To obtain geometrically identical images, Ektaspeed Plus films and storage phosphor plates were exposed simultaneously. The imaging plates were scanned in a Digora scanner and the files transferred to a different platform for image enhancement. Nine observers viewed films and storage phosphor images without provisions for adjustment of image intensity and contrast. For each imaging modality, 240 approximal surfaces were rated for caries on a 5-point confidence scale. Definite and probable caries lesions were also rated for lesion depth, and all ratings were compared with the histological state. Diagnostic accuracy was expressed as the area under the ROC curve (A(z) value). Paired t tests were used to compare the imaging modalities for diagnostic accuracy and F tests to compare observer variances.
RESULTS: Enhanced storage phosphor images demonstrated significantly higher mean A(z) values than film (p = 0.0066). Significantly higher mean A(z) values were demonstrated in the outer half of enamel (p = 0.01), but no significant differences were found between the modalities for caries lesions penetrating beyond the outer half of the enamel. The number of correctly diagnosed true-positive surfaces with caries in outer enamel was significantly higher with storage phosphor images than with film (p = 0.00014). False-positive surfaces were most frequently registered in the outer enamel with both modalities, but in this region the number of false-positive surfaces was significantly higher with storage phosphor images than with film (p = 0.0038). Pooled sensitivity and specificity values were 0.48/0.94 and 0.61/0.86 for film and storage phosphor images, respectively. The interobserver variability was significantly lower for storage phosphor images than for film.
CONCLUSION: Enhancement of storage phosphor images with a caries-specific procedure significantly improved the accuracy of caries depth assessments in the outer half of the enamel compared with film radiography and reduced observer variability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11093017     DOI: 10.1159/000016622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Caries Res        ISSN: 0008-6568            Impact factor:   4.056


  9 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy of different imaging modalities in detection of proximal caries.

Authors:  B Senel; K Kamburoglu; O Uçok; S P Yüksel; T Ozen; H Avsever
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  The effects of noise reduction, sharpening, enhancement, and image magnification on diagnostic accuracy of a photostimulable phosphor system in the detection of non-cavitated approximal dental caries.

Authors:  Zahra Dalili Kajan; Reza Tayefeh Davalloo; Mayam Tavangar; Fatemeh Valizade
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2015-06-19

3.  Detection of non-cavitated approximal caries lesions in digital images from seven solid-state receptors with particular focus on task-specific enhancement filters. An ex vivo study in human teeth.

Authors:  Francisco Haiter-Neto; Andrea dos Anjos Pontual; Morten Frydenberg; Ann Wenzel
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  Radiographic modalities for diagnosis of caries in a historical perspective: from film to machine-intelligence supported systems.

Authors:  Ann Wenzel
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Diagnostic Value of Conventional and Digital Radiography for Detection of Cavitated and Non-Cavitated Proximal Caries.

Authors:  Mahdieh Dehghani; Rasool Barzegari; Hosein Tabatabai; Sahar Ghanea
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2017-01

6.  Assessing the Accuracy of Caries Diagnosis in Bitewing Radiographs Using Different Reproduction Media.

Authors:  Sadaf Adibi; Anita Amrollahi; Ali Dehghani Nazhvani; Najmeh Movahhedian
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2018-09

7.  Comparison of diagnostic methods for early interproximal caries detection with near-infrared light transillumination: an in vivo study.

Authors:  Ismail Hakki Baltacioglu; Kaan Orhan
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 2.757

8.  Diagnostic accuracy of digital and conventional radiography in the detection of non-cavitated approximal dental caries.

Authors:  Farida Abesi; Alireza Mirshekar; Ehsan Moudi; Maryam Seyedmajidi; Sina Haghanifar; Nima Haghighat; Ali Bijani
Journal:  Iran J Radiol       Date:  2012-03-25       Impact factor: 0.212

9.  Imaging modalities to inform the detection and diagnosis of early caries.

Authors:  Tanya Walsh; Richard Macey; Philip Riley; Anne-Marie Glenny; Falk Schwendicke; Helen V Worthington; Janet E Clarkson; David Ricketts; Ting-Li Su; Anita Sengupta
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-15
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.