Literature DB >> 11092668

Noninvasive estimation of transmitral pressure drop across the normal mitral valve in humans: importance of convective and inertial forces during left ventricular filling.

M S Firstenberg1, P M Vandervoort, N L Greenberg, N G Smedira, P M McCarthy, M J Garcia, J D Thomas.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that color M-mode (CMM) images could be used to solve the Euler equation, yielding regional pressure gradients along the scanline, which could then be integrated to yield the unsteady Bernoulli equation and estimate noninvasively both the convective and inertial components of the transmitral pressure difference.
BACKGROUND: Pulsed and continuous wave Doppler velocity measurements are routinely used clinically to assess severity of stenotic and regurgitant valves. However, only the convective component of the pressure gradient is measured, thereby neglecting the contribution of inertial forces, which may be significant, particularly for nonstenotic valves. Color M-mode provides a spatiotemporal representation of flow across the mitral valve.
METHODS: In eight patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, high-fidelity left atrial and ventricular pressure measurements were obtained synchronously with transmitral CMM digital recordings. The instantaneous diastolic transmitral pressure difference was computed from the M-mode spatiotemporal velocity distribution using the unsteady flow form of the Bernoulli equation and was compared to the catheter measurements.
RESULTS: From 56 beats in 16 hemodynamic stages, inclusion of the inertial term ([deltapI]max = 1.78+/-1.30 mm Hg) in the noninvasive pressure difference calculation significantly increased the temporal correlation with catheter-based measurement (r = 0.35+/-0.24 vs. 0.81+/-0.15, p< 0.0001). It also allowed an accurate approximation of the peak pressure difference ([deltapc+I]max = 0.95 [delta(p)cathh]max + 0.24, r = 0.96, p<0.001, error = 0.08+/-0.54 mm Hg).
CONCLUSIONS: Inertial forces are significant components of the maximal pressure drop across the normal mitral valve. These can be accurately estimated noninvasively using CMM recordings of transmitral flow, which should improve the understanding of diastolic filling and function of the heart.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NASA Discipline Cardiopulmonary; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11092668     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00963-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  17 in total

1.  Assessment of methodologies to calculate intraventricular pressure differences in computational models and patients.

Authors:  Francisco J Londono-Hoyos; Abigail Swillens; Joris Van Cauwenberge; Brett Meyers; Maheswara Reddy Koppula; Pavlos Vlachos; Julio A Chirinos; Patrick Segers
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  MRI Assessment of Diastolic and Systolic Intraventricular Pressure Gradients in Heart Failure.

Authors:  Snigdha Jain; Francisco J Londono; Patrick Segers; Thierry C Gillebert; Marc De Buyzere; Julio A Chirinos
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2016-02

3.  Relative pressure estimation from 4D flow MRI using generalized Bernoulli equation in a phantom model of arterial stenosis.

Authors:  Amirkhosro Kazemi; Daniel A Padgett; Sean Callahan; Marcus Stoddard; Amir A Amini
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.533

4.  A novel methodology for personalized simulations of ventricular hemodynamics from noninvasive imaging data.

Authors:  A de Vecchi; A Gomez; K Pushparajah; T Schaeffter; J M Simpson; R Razavi; G P Penney; N P Smith; D A Nordsletten
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 4.790

5.  Non-invasive intraventricular pressure differences estimated with cardiac MRI in subjects without heart failure and with heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Francisco Londono-Hoyos; Patrick Segers; Zeba Hashmath; Garrett Oldland; Maheshwara Reddy Koppula; Khuzaima Javaid; Rachana Miller; Rushikkumar Bhuva; Izzah Vasim; Ali Tariq; Walter Witschey; Scott Akers; Julio Alonso Chirinos
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2019-10-09

6.  Sensitivity analysis of left ventricle with dilated cardiomyopathy in fluid structure simulation.

Authors:  Bee Ting Chan; Noor Azuan Abu Osman; Einly Lim; Kok Han Chee; Yang Faridah Abdul Aziz; Amr Al Abed; Nigel H Lovell; Socrates Dokos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Nonconvective forces: a critical and often ignored component in the echocardiographic assessment of transvalvular pressure gradients.

Authors:  Michael S Firstenberg; Erik E Abel; Thomas J Papadimos; Ravi S Tripathi
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 1.866

8.  Non-invasive pressure difference estimation from PC-MRI using the work-energy equation.

Authors:  Fabrizio Donati; C Alberto Figueroa; Nicolas P Smith; Pablo Lamata; David A Nordsletten
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 8.545

9.  Aortic relative pressure components derived from four-dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Pablo Lamata; Alex Pitcher; Sebastian Krittian; David Nordsletten; Malenka M Bissell; Thomas Cassar; Alex J Barker; Michael Markl; Stefan Neubauer; Nicolas P Smith
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Estimation of maximum intraventricular pressure: a three-dimensional fluid-structure interaction model.

Authors:  Hamidreza Ghasemi Bahraseman; Kamran Hassani; Arezoo Khosravi; Mahdi Navidbakhsh; Daniel M Espino; Davood Kazemi-Saleh; Naser Fatourayee
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 2.819

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.