Literature DB >> 11092331

Protein dispersibility index as an indicator of adequately processed soybean meal.

A B Batal1, M W Douglas, A E Engram, C M Parsons.   

Abstract

Three chick assays (8 to 17 or 21 d) were conducted to evaluate protein dispersibility index (PDI) as an indicator of minimum adequate heat processing of soybean meal compared with the urease index and protein solubility in 0.2% KOH. Solvent-extracted soyflakes (SF) were subjected to various autoclaving times at 121 C and 105 kPa and were included in 23% CP dextrose-SF diets or 20% CP corn-SF-corn gluten meal diets. Autoclaving times in Chick Assays 1, 2, and 3 were 0 to 36 min, 0 to 30 min, and 0 to 12 min, respectively. Body weight gains and gain-to-feed ratios increased (P < 0.05) with increased SF heating time (0 to 18 min in Chick Assay 1, 0 to 10 min in Chick Assay 2, and 0 to 9 min in Chick Assay 3), with no additional improvement for longer autoclaving times. Urease index values (pH increase) were high initially and at the shorter autoclaving times (1.65 to 2.4), and then decreased suddenly to 0.3 or below as autoclaving time increased in two of the three chick assays. The KOH protein solubility values generally decreased as autoclaving time increased, but the responses were often inconsistent. Protein dispersibility index displayed the most consistent responses to heating time: it decreased from above 70% to generally below 30% as autoclaving time increased from 0 to 30 or 36 min (mean r2 from linear regression of PDI on autoclaving time was 0.92 for the three chick assays). The latter responses were particularly evident for the heating times, which yielded the greatest changes in chick growth performance. These results suggest that PDI is a more consistent and sensitive indicator of minimum adequate heat processing of soybean meal than urease index or protein solubility in KOH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11092331     DOI: 10.1093/ps/79.11.1592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  7 in total

1.  The use of food wastes as feed ingredients for culturing grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus) in Hong Kong.

Authors:  W M Choi; C L Lam; W Y Mo; M H Wong
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-10-03       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Measures Matter-Determining the True Nutri-Physiological Value of Feed Ingredients for Swine.

Authors:  Gerald C Shurson; Yuan-Tai Hung; Jae Cheol Jang; Pedro E Urriola
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Mapping the variability in physical, cooking, and nutritional properties of Zamnè, a wild food in Burkina Faso.

Authors:  Moustapha Soungalo Drabo; Habtu Shumoy; Hama Cissé; Charles Parkouda; Fulbert Nikiéma; Ismail Odetokun; Yves Traoré; Aly Savadogo; Katleen Raes
Journal:  Food Res Int       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 6.475

4.  Anti-Nutritional Factors and Protein Dispersibility Index as Principal Quality Indicators for Soybean Meal in Diet of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus GIFT), a Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Shifeng Ma; Hao Wang; Yulong Dou; Xiaofang Liang; Yinhua Zheng; Xiufeng Wu; Min Xue
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.231

Review 5.  Trends in feed evaluation for poultry with emphasis on in vitro techniques.

Authors:  Faegheh Zaefarian; Aaron J Cowieson; Katrine Pontoppidan; M Reza Abdollahi; Velmurugu Ravindran
Journal:  Anim Nutr       Date:  2021-01-09

Review 6.  In Vitro Methods of Assessing Protein Quality for Poultry.

Authors:  Dervan D S L Bryan; Henry L Classen
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Microwave irradiation of whole soybeans in ruminant nutrition: Protein and carbohydrate metabolism in vitro and in situ.

Authors:  Sara Golshan; Rasoul Pirmohammadi; Hamed Khalilvandi-Behroozyar
Journal:  Vet Res Forum       Date:  2019-12-15       Impact factor: 1.054

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.