Literature DB >> 11092285

Linking pharmacy and laboratory data to assess the appropriateness of care in patients with diabetes.

H P Wetzler1, J W Snyder.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To use pharmacy and laboratory data to assess diabetes care within a medical group and between medical groups and to determine dispensing patterns and the extent to which providers change therapy based on HbA1c results. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Participating groups submitted 1 year of data for continuously enrolled patients. Required data included date of birth, all diabetes-specific prescriptions (oral hypoglycemic agents and insulin), date of prescription, National Drug Code, all HbA1c values, lower and upper normal limits, and date of testing.
RESULTS: Few changes in therapy were noted despite the large percentages of patients with suboptimal control. Nearly 90% of the patients treated with medications received a monotherapy regimen involving one of three therapeutic agents: sulfonylureas, metformin, or insulin. More than three-fourths of the patients remained on the same therapy during the observation period despite the fact that 27% of these patients had HbA1c values > or = 8%. Nearly one-fifth (18%) of patients had an HbA1c level of > or = 8% and no further testing for at least 90 days after the "actionable" HbA1C result was obtained. Furthermore, 54% of patients with actionable HbA1c results did not have a change in therapy initiated after the result was available.
CONCLUSIONS: The American Diabetes Association recommendations to act on HbA1c values > or = 8% and to follow up regularly on patients found to be in suboptimal control do not appear to be applied in a consistent manner based on the pharmacy and laboratory data analyzed in this sample.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11092285     DOI: 10.2337/diacare.23.11.1637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  7 in total

1.  Developing a quality measure for clinical inertia in diabetes care.

Authors:  Dan R Berlowitz; Arlene S Ash; Mark Glickman; Robert H Friedman; Leonard M Pogach; Audrey L Nelson; Ashley T Wong
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Correlating pharmaceutical data with a national health survey as a proxy for estimating rural population health.

Authors:  Ronald E Cossman; Jeralynn S Cossman; Wesley L James; Troy Blanchard; Richard Thomas; Louis G Pol; Arthur G Cosby
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2010-09-14

3.  Understanding pharmacist decision making for adverse drug event (ADE) detection.

Authors:  Shobha Phansalkar; Jennifer M Hoffman; John F Hurdle; Vimla L Patel
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.431

4.  National Rates of Initiation and Intensification of Antidiabetic Therapy Among Patients With Commercial Insurance.

Authors:  Lauren G Gilstrap; Ateev Mehrotra; Barbara Bai; Sherri Rose; Rachel A Blair; Michael E Chernew
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Influence of comorbidities on therapeutic progression of diabetes treatment in Australian veterans: a cohort study.

Authors:  Agnes I Vitry; Elizabeth E Roughead; Adrian K Preiss; Philip Ryan; Emmae N Ramsay; Andrew L Gilbert; Gillian E Caughey; Sepehr Shakib; Adrian Esterman; Ying Zhang; Robyn A McDermott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Describing medicine therapy management of type 2 diabetes mellitus at primary health care facilities in Cape Town.

Authors:  Khathatso B Monanabela; Mea van Huyssteen; Renier Coetzee
Journal:  Health SA       Date:  2019-10-16

7.  Sustained hyperglycemia among patients with diabetes: what matters when action is needed?

Authors:  Jennifer E Lafata; Elizabeth A Dobie; George W Divine; Marianne E Ulcickas Yood; Bruce D McCarthy
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 19.112

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.