Literature DB >> 11092080

Measuring outcome.

A Tennant1.   

Abstract

In the context of health and illness, outcome is usually defined as the extent to which goals are achieved. It is necessary to understand: (i) the conceptual basis of the consequences of stroke; (ii) the context of measurement; and (iii) the calibre of the instruments available. In 1980, the World Health Organization provided an appropriate conceptual framework. The location, for example in-patient or out-patient, must be considered; as should the professional mix of the service; the time since onset and whether or not the setting is routine clinical practice or research. For the calibre of the measuring instruments psychometric studies report on reliability and validity. Other limitations and omissions in current measurement practice are being addressed through Item Response Theory. In clinical practice, current use of outcome measures is limited but it would seem that, by default at least, a core set of outcome measures is emerging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11092080     DOI: 10.1258/0007142001903210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med Bull        ISSN: 0007-1420            Impact factor:   4.291


  4 in total

1.  [Item response theory and its application in neurology. Measurement of activity limitations in neurologic patients].

Authors:  S Gauggel; M Böcker; P Zimmermann; C Privou; D Lutz
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.214

2.  Integrating validity theory with use of measurement instruments in clinical settings.

Authors:  P Adam Kelly; Kimberly J O'Malley; Michael A Kallen; Marvella E Ford
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  The Norwegian version of the QOLIBRI - a study of metric properties based on a 12 month follow-up of persons with traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Helene Lundgaard Soberg; Cecilie Roe; Cathrine Brunborg; Nicole von Steinbüchel; Nada Andelic
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 3.186

4.  Psychometric properties of the pain stages of change questionnaire as evaluated by Rasch analysis in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.

Authors:  Cecilie Røe; Elin Damsgård; Terese Fors; Audny Anke
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 2.362

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.