Literature DB >> 11091604

Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Breast Cancer on Mammograms.

.   

Abstract

Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) is a diagnosis made by a physician who takes into account the computer output of quantitative analysis of mammograms. CAD schemes in mammography have been developed to detect lesions such as clustered microcalcifications and masses, and also to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Computerized schemes are composed of three major steps which are image processing, quantitation of image features, and data classification. The current performance level of detecting clustered microcalcifications by computer is approximately 85% at a false positive rate of 0.5 per mammogram, whereas the detection accuracy of masses is approximately 90% at a false positive rate of 2 per mammogram. Observer performance studies indicated that computer output can improve the performance of radiologists in detecting clustered microcalcifications by increasing the dtection accuracy to 90% from 80% at a specificity of 90%. The automated classification of clustered microcalcifications is based on quantitative analysis of image features of individual microcalcifications and cluster, followed by artificial neural networks (ANNs) for data classification. With our database, the computer scheme correctly identified 82% of patients with benign lesions, all of whom had biopsies (ie, the radiologist thought the microcalcifications were suspicious for malignancy), and 100% of patients with malignant lesions. On the same set of images, the average of five radiologists was only 27% correct in classifying lesions as benign at 100% sensitivity. The automated classification of masses is made by the quantitation of image features of masses together with a rule-based and ANNs method for data classification. The computer scheme achieved, at 100% sensitivity, a positive predictive value of 83%, which was 12% higher than that of the experienced mammographer and 21% higher than that of the average of less experienced mammographers. The first prototype intelligent workstation for mammography was developed at the University of Chicago, and applied to approximately 12000 screening cases for the detection of early breast cancers. Promising initial results were obtained with the workstation.

Entities:  

Year:  1997        PMID: 11091604     DOI: 10.1007/BF02966511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer        ISSN: 1340-6868            Impact factor:   4.239


  6 in total

1.  Automated recognition of lateral from PA chest radiographs: saving seconds in a PACS environment.

Authors:  John M Boone; Greg S Hurlock; J Anthony Seibert; Richard L Kennedy
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-01-30       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 2.  Pro-oncogenic and anti-oncogenic pathways: opportunities and challenges of cancer therapy.

Authors:  Jiao Zhang; Yan-Hua Chen; Qun Lu
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.404

3.  Receiver operating characteristic analysis for the detection of simulated microcalcifications on mammograms using hardcopy images.

Authors:  Chao-Jen Lai; Chris C Shaw; Gary J Whitman; Wei T Yang; Peter J Dempsey; Victoria Nguyen; Mary F Ice
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography.

Authors:  Joshua J Fenton; Stephen H Taplin; Patricia A Carney; Linn Abraham; Edward A Sickles; Carl D'Orsi; Eric A Berns; Gary Cutter; R Edward Hendrick; William E Barlow; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Using quantitative image analysis to classify axillary lymph nodes on breast MRI: a new application for the Z 0011 Era.

Authors:  David V Schacht; Karen Drukker; Iris Pak; Hiroyuki Abe; Maryellen L Giger
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  "Hippocrates-mst": a prototype for computer-aided microcalcification analysis and risk assessment for breast cancer.

Authors:  George Spyrou; Smaragda Kapsimalakou; Antonis Frigas; Konstantinos Koufopoulos; Stamatios Vassilaros; Panos Ligomenides
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 2.602

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.