Literature DB >> 11091534

CAF versus CAF plus Medroxyprogesterone Acetate for Treatment of Liver Metastases of Breast Cancer.

.   

Abstract

A controlled randomized trial was conducted to compare the effectiveness of a CAF therapy including cyclophosphamide (CPA), adriamycin (ADR) and 5-fluorouracil (5FU) with that of CAF plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) therapy including CPA, ADR and 5FU plus MPA for the treatment of liver metastases from breast cancer. A total of 34 patients with unresectable liver metastases from breast cancer were divided into two treatment groups(CAF and CAF + MPA)with stratification for estrogen receptor status. The response rate was 13%(2PR in 16 patients)for CAF therapy and 22% (1 CR and 3 PR in 18 patients) for CAF plus MPA therapy. There was no significant difference in response rates, median survival periods and survival rates between the two treatment groups. However, CAF therapy had significantly more toxicity than did CAF plus MPA therapy. The findings of this study suggested that CAF plus MPA therapy is a well-tolerated and effective treatment for patients with liver metastases of breast cancer.

Entities:  

Year:  1995        PMID: 11091534     DOI: 10.1007/BF02966898

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer        ISSN: 1340-6868            Impact factor:   4.239


  18 in total

1.  Conventional Dose CAF Therapy versus Low Dose Adriamycin Therapy in the Treatment of Advanced Breast Cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  1994-07-30       Impact factor: 4.239

2.  Improvement of hematological and general tolerance to CMF by high-dose medroxyprogesterone acetate (HD-MPA) adjuvant treatment for primary node positive breast cancer (analysis of 100 patients).

Authors:  C Focan; A Baudoux; M Beauduin; U Bunescu; N Dehasque; L Dewasch; J P Lobelle; E Longeval; F Majois; E Salamon
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  1986 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.480

3.  Toxicity grading criteria of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group. The Clinical Trial Review Committee of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group.

Authors:  K Tobinai; A Kohno; Y Shimada; T Watanabe; T Tamura; K Takeyama; M Narabayashi; T Fukutomi; H Kondo; M Shimoyama
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Oestradiol- and dihydrotestosterone receptors in normal and neoplastic human mammary tissue.

Authors:  R K Wagner; P W Jungblut
Journal:  Acta Endocrinol (Copenh)       Date:  1976-05

5.  Estrogen receptors in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  N Nagasue; A Ito; H Yukaya; Y Ogawa
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1986-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Androgen and estrogen receptors in hepatocellular carcinoma and in the surrounding noncancerous liver tissue.

Authors:  S Ohnishi; T Murakami; T Moriyama; K Mitamura; M Imawari
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1986 May-Jun       Impact factor: 17.425

7.  Clinical course of breast cancer patients with liver metastases.

Authors:  J W Zinser; G N Hortobagyi; A U Buzdar; T L Smith; G Fraschini
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  A comparison of cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, 5-fluorouracil (CAF) and cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, vincristine, prednisone (CMFVP) in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a Southeastern Cancer Study Group project.

Authors:  R V Smalley; J Carpenter; A Bartolucci; C Vogel; S Krauss
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Androgens inhibit basal and estrogen-induced cell proliferation in the ZR-75-1 human breast cancer cell line.

Authors:  R Poulin; D Baker; F Labrie
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 10.  Chemotherapy of breast cancer: current views and results.

Authors:  G Bonadonna; P Valagussa
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.