Literature DB >> 11091326

Absence of evidence for isolation by distance in an expanding cane toad (Bufo marinus) population: an individual-based analysis of microsatellite genotypes.

R Leblois1, F Rousset, D Tikel, C Moritz, A Estoup.   

Abstract

The cane toad (Bufo marinus) was introduced in 1935 in Australia, where it spread rapidly. We have tested for isolation by distance by analysing at a local geographical scale a continuous population using seven microsatellite markers and an individual-based method. The matrix of pairwise individual differentiation was not significantly correlated with that of geographical distance. Regression analyses gave a low positive slope of 0.00072 (all individuals) or a negative slope of 0.0017 (individuals with a distance higher than the previously estimated mean dispersal distance). The absence of evidence for isolation by distance favours the hypothesis that the substantial differentiation and autocorrelation previously observed at enzyme loci, mainly results from discontinuities in the colonization process with founder effects occurring at the time of the establishment of new populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11091326     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.01091.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  13 in total

1.  The rise and fall of isolation by distance in the anadromous brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis Mitchill).

Authors:  Vincent Castric; Louis Bernatchez
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Mixed population genomics support for the central marginal hypothesis across the invasive range of the cane toad (Rhinella marina) in Australia.

Authors:  Daryl R Trumbo; Brendan Epstein; Paul A Hohenlohe; Ross A Alford; Lin Schwarzkopf; Andrew Storfer
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  The archipelago of Fernando de Noronha: an intriguing malformed toad hotspot in South America.

Authors:  Luís Felipe Toledo; Ricardo S Ribeiro
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 3.184

4.  Inferring population history from microsatellite and enzyme data in serially introduced cane toads, Bufo marinus.

Authors:  A Estoup; I J Wilson; C Sullivan; J M Cornuet; C Moritz
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  ORIGINS AND GENETIC DIVERSITY OF INTRODUCED POPULATIONS OF THE PUERTO RICAN RED-EYED COQUÍ, ELEUTHERODACTYLUS ANTILLENSIS, IN SAINT CROIX (U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS) AND PANAMÁ.

Authors:  Brittany S Barker; Javier A Rodríguez-Robles
Journal:  Copeia       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 1.402

6.  Ecological and genetic divergence between two lineages of middle American túngara frogs Physalaemus (= Engystomops) pustulosus.

Authors:  Heike Pröhl; Santiago R Ron; Michael J Ryan
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Genetic signatures of a range expansion in natura: when clones play leapfrog.

Authors:  Ronan Becheler; Constance Xhaard; Etienne K Klein; Katherine J Hayden; Pascal Frey; Stéphane De Mita; Fabien Halkett
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Diversity and distribution of genetic variation in gammarids: Comparing patterns between invasive and non-invasive species.

Authors:  Miguel Baltazar-Soares; Filipa Paiva; Yiyong Chen; Aibin Zhan; Elizabeta Briski
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Weak population structure in the ant Formica fusca.

Authors:  Helena Johansson; Perttu Seppä; Heikki Helanterä; Kalevi Trontti; Liselotte Sundström
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Geographic variation in sexual attraction of Spodoptera frugiperda corn- and rice-strain males to pheromone lures.

Authors:  Melanie Unbehend; Sabine Hänniger; Gissella M Vásquez; María Laura Juárez; Dominic Reisig; Jeremy N McNeil; Robert L Meagher; David A Jenkins; David G Heckel; Astrid T Groot
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.