Literature DB >> 11091244

Results of surgical treatment for faecal incontinence.

A Osterberg1, K Edebol Eeg-Olofsson, W Graf.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This prospective study was designed to evaluate the results of anterior levatorplasty and sphincteroplasty for faecal incontinence with respect to symptomatic and physiological outcome.
METHODS: Thirty-one patients with idiopathic (neurogenic) faecal incontinence underwent anterior levatorplasty and 20 patients with traumatic anal sphincter injury underwent anal sphincteroplasty. The outcome of repair was evaluated at 3 and 12 months using a validated questionnaire and anorectal manometry/manovolumetry.
RESULTS: Eighteen of 31 patients in the levatorplasty group reported continence to solid and liquid stools 1 year after operation compared with two patients before surgery (P < 0.01). The corresponding figures in the sphincteroplasty group were ten and two of 20 respectively (P < 0.05). The incontinence score was improved in both groups after 1 year, from a median score of 14 to 3 in the levatorplasty group (P < 0.001) and from 8.5 to 3.5 in the sphincteroplasty group (P < 0.01). Improvements in the degree of social and physical handicap were also observed in both groups. No changes were seen in anal canal pressures or rectal sensation in either group.
CONCLUSION: Despite different aetiologies and surgical approaches, anterior levatorplasty and sphincteroplasty yielded similarly successful results in patients with faecal incontinence. Although a marked symptomatic improvement was seen in both groups, no associated physiological alterations could be detected. The reason for the improvement is thus unclear, but it may result from a stenosing effect in the anal canal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11091244     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01568.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  3 in total

1.  Overlapping anal sphincter repair and anterior levatorplasty: effect of patient's age and duration of follow-up.

Authors:  Charles Evans; Kathy Davis; Devinder Kumar
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Anal inspection and digital rectal examination compared to anorectal physiology tests and endoanal ultrasonography in evaluating fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Annette C Dobben; Maaike P Terra; Marije Deutekom; Michael F Gerhards; A Bart Bijnen; Richelle J F Felt-Bersma; Lucas W M Janssen; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-11-10       Impact factor: 2.796

3.  Libertas: a phase II placebo-controlled study of NRL001 in patients with faecal incontinence showed an unexpected and sustained placebo response.

Authors:  L Siproudhis; W Graf; A Emmanuel; D Walker; R Ng Kwet Shing; C Pediconi; J Pilot; S Wexner; J Scholefield
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 2.571

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.