Literature DB >> 11091109

Graphical analysis of PET data applied to reversible and irreversible tracers.

J Logan1.   

Abstract

The differential equations of compartmental analysis form the basis of the models describing the uptake of tracers used in imaging studies. Graphical analyses convert the model equations into linear plots, the slopes of which represent measures of tracer binding. The graphical methods are not dependent upon a particular model structure but the slopes can be related to combinations of the model parameters if a model structure is assumed. The input required is uptake data from a region of interest vs time and an input function that can either be plasma measurements or uptake data from a suitable reference region. Graphical methods can be applied to both reversible and irreversibly binding tracers. They provide considerable ease of computation compared to the optimization of individual model parameters in the solution of the differential equations generally used to describe the binding of tracers. Conditions under which the graphical techniques are applicable and some problems encountered in separating tracer delivery and binding are considered. Also the effect of noise can introduce a bias in the distribution volume which is the slope of the graphical analysis of reversible tracers. Smoothing techniques may minimize this problem and retain the model independence. In any case graphical techniques can provide insight into the binding kinetics of tracers in a visual way.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11091109     DOI: 10.1016/s0969-8051(00)00137-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucl Med Biol        ISSN: 0969-8051            Impact factor:   2.408


  131 in total

1.  Modified regression model for the Logan plot.

Authors:  József Varga; Zsolt Szabo
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.200

2.  Towards PET imaging of intact pancreatic beta cell mass: a transgenic strategy.

Authors:  Rebecca McGirr; Shirley Hu; Siu-Pok Yee; Michael S Kovacs; Ting-Yim Lee; Savita Dhanvantari
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 3.  Dynamic single photon emission computed tomography--basic principles and cardiac applications.

Authors:  Grant T Gullberg; Bryan W Reutter; Arkadiusz Sitek; Jonathan S Maltz; Thomas F Budinger
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Fetal dopamine receptor characteristics assessed in utero.

Authors:  Rachel M Bartlett; Onofre T Dejesus; Todd E Barnhart; R Jerome Nickles; Bradley T Christian; John L Graner; James E Holden
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 6.200

5.  Endogenous dopamine (DA) competes with the binding of a radiolabeled D₃ receptor partial agonist in vivo: a positron emission tomography study.

Authors:  Robert H Mach; Zhude Tu; Jinbin Xu; Shihong Li; Lynne A Jones; Michelle Taylor; Robert R Luedtke; Colin P Derdeyn; Joel S Perlmutter; Mark A Mintun
Journal:  Synapse       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 2.562

6.  Copper-64-diacetyl-bis(N(4)-methylthiosemicarbazone) pharmacokinetics in FaDu xenograft tumors and correlation with microscopic markers of hypoxia.

Authors:  Keisha C McCall; John L Humm; Rachel Bartlett; Megan Reese; Sean Carlin
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Direct 4D reconstruction of parametric images incorporating anato-functional joint entropy.

Authors:  Jing Tang; Hiroto Kuwabara; Dean F Wong; Arman Rahmim
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Non-invasive assessment of distribution volume ratios and binding potential: tissue heterogeneity and interindividually averaged time-activity curves.

Authors:  M Reimold; W Mueller-Schauenburg; G A Becker; G Reischl; B M Dohmen; R Bares
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Dopamine and the cognitive downside of a promised bonus.

Authors:  Esther Aarts; Deanna L Wallace; Linh C Dang; William J Jagust; Roshan Cools; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-02-13

10.  Kinetic Analysis and Quantification of [¹¹C]Martinostat for in Vivo HDAC Imaging of the Brain.

Authors:  Hsiao-Ying Wey; Changning Wang; Frederick A Schroeder; Jean Logan; Julie C Price; Jacob M Hooker
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 4.418

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.