Literature DB >> 11089754

Assessment of hemodynamic and gastric mucosal acidosis with modified fluid versus 6% hydroxyethyl starch: a prospective, randomized study.

P Asfar1, N Kerkeni, F Labadie, J P Gouëllo, O Brenet, P Alquier.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of 4 % succinylated modified fluid gelatin (MFG) versus mean weight, highly substituted 6% hydroxyethyl starch (HES) on hemodynamic and gastric mucosal acidosis variables, in septic hypovolemic patients.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, clinical investigation.
SETTING: University hospital intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Thirty-four septic hypovolemic ventilated and hemodynamically controlled patients.
INTERVENTIONS: Invasive hemodynamic and gastric tonometric measurements. MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: Hemodynamic and tonometric parameters were recorded at baseline and 60 min after infusion of 500 ml of each colloid. In all patients central venous pressure, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, cardiac index and mean arterial pressure increased significantly with both colloids, and hemoglobin concentration decreased by the same amount while oxygen delivery remained stable. Gastric intramucosal pH increased from 7.27 +/- 0.08 to 7.31 +/- 0.07 (p < 0.001) with MFG and decreased non-significantly from 7.26 +/- 0.11 to 7.22 +/- 0.08 (ns) with HES. Carbon dioxide gastric mucosal arterial gradient decreased from 18 +/- 9 to 13 +/- 9 mmHg (p < 0.0005) in the MFG group and rose non-significantly from 18 +/- 11 to 21 +/- 11 mmHg with HES.
CONCLUSIONS: Although MFG and 6% HES have the same hemodynamic effects, their physicochemical properties induce different responses on gastric mucosal acidosis in septic, hypovolemic and ventilated patients. These effects of MFG and HES on gastric mucosa need to be considered in patient management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11089754     DOI: 10.1007/s001340000606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  13 in total

Review 1.  The impact of fluid therapy on microcirculation and tissue oxygenation in hypovolemic patients: a review.

Authors:  Joachim Boldt; Can Ince
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Is there still a place for the Swan-Ganz catheter? Yes.

Authors:  Julien Demiselle; Alain Mercat; Pierre Asfar
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Colloid solutions for fluid resuscitation.

Authors:  Frances Bunn; Daksha Trivedi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-07-11

4.  Effects of rapid fluid infusion on hemoglobin concentration: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Armin A Quispe-Cornejo; Ana L Alves da Cunha; Hassane Njimi; Wasineenart Mongkolpun; Ana L Valle-Martins; Mónica Arébalo-López; Jacques Creteur; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-10-23       Impact factor: 19.334

5.  Effects of fluid challenge on gastric mucosal PCO2 in septic patients.

Authors:  Eliézer Silva; Daniel De Backer; Jacques Creteur; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-01-13       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Fluid resuscitation with colloids of different molecular weight in septic shock.

Authors:  Zsolt Molnár; András Mikor; Tamás Leiner; Tamás Szakmány
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 7.  Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.38-0.45 versus crystalloid or albumin in patients with sepsis: systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Authors:  Nicolai Haase; Anders Perner; Louise Inkeri Hennings; Martin Siegemund; Bo Lauridsen; Mik Wetterslev; Jørn Wetterslev
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-02-15

8.  Systematic review of randomized clinical trials on the use of hydroxyethyl starch for fluid management in sepsis.

Authors:  Christian J Wiedermann
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2008-01-24

Review 9.  Clinical review: influence of vasoactive and other therapies on intestinal and hepatic circulations in patients with septic shock.

Authors:  Pierre Asfar; Daniel De Backer; Andreas Meier-Hellmann; Peter Radermacher; Samir G Sakka
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2003-12-29       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 10.  Pro/con clinical debate: Hydroxyethylstarches should be avoided in septic patients.

Authors:  Frédérique Schortgen; Laurent Brochard; Ellen Burnham; Greg S Martin
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2003-02-19       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.