Literature DB >> 11089713

Failure of evidence-based medicine in the treatment of hypertension in older patients.

E L Knight1, R J Glynn, R Levin, D A Ganz, J Avorn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Throughout the 1990s, the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure recommended initial antihypertensive therapy with a thiazide diuretic or a beta-blocker based on evidence from randomized, controlled trials, unless an indication existed for another drug class. The committee also recommended beta-blockers in hypertensive patients with a history of myocardial infarction (MI), and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). Our objective was to determine whether prescribing practices for older hypertensive patients are consistent with evidence-based guidelines.
METHODS: We examined prescription patterns from January 1, 1991 through December 31, 1995 for 23,748 patients 65 years or older with a new diagnosis of hypertension from the New Jersey Medicaid program and that state's Pharmacy Assistance for the Aged and Disabled program (PAAD). We linked drug use data with information on demographic variables and comorbid medical conditions.
RESULTS: During the study period, calcium channel blockers were the most commonly prescribed initial therapy for hypertension (41%), followed by ACE inhibitors (24%), thiazide diuretics (17%), and beta-blockers (10%). Eliminating patients with diabetes mellitus, CHF, angina, or history of MI did not substantially affect these results. Overall, initial use of a thiazide declined from 22% in 1991 to 10% in 1995, while initial use of a calcium channel blocker increased from 28% to 43%, despite publication during these years of studies demonstrating a benefit of thiazides in older patients. Only 15% of older hypertensive patients with a history of MI received beta-blockers.
CONCLUSIONS: Prescribing practices for older hypertensive patients are not consistent with evidence-based guidelines. Interventions are needed to encourage evidence-driven prescribing practices for the treatment of hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11089713      PMCID: PMC1495604          DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.91020.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  33 in total

1.  Use of Medicaid data for pharmacoepidemiology.

Authors:  W A Ray; M R Griffin
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  The 1988 report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1988-05

3.  Effect of enalapril on survival in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions and congestive heart failure.

Authors:  Salim Yusuf; Bertram Pitt; Clarence E Davis; William B Hood; Jay N Cohn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-08-01       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Morbidity and mortality in the Swedish Trial in Old Patients with Hypertension (STOP-Hypertension)

Authors:  B Dahlöf; L H Lindholm; L Hansson; B Scherstén; T Ekbom; P O Wester
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-11-23       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Prevention of stroke by antihypertensive drug treatment in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension. Final results of the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP). SHEP Cooperative Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-06-26       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Prevention of diabetic nephropathy with enalapril in normotensive diabetics with microalbuminuria.

Authors:  M Marre; G Chatellier; H Leblanc; T T Guyene; J Menard; P Passa
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-10-29

7.  Effects of enalapril on mortality in severe congestive heart failure. Results of the Cooperative North Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study (CONSENSUS).

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-06-04       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Timolol-induced reduction in mortality and reinfarction in patients surviving acute myocardial infarction.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1981-04-02       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Cost-minimization and the number needed to treat in uncomplicated hypertension.

Authors:  K A Pearce; C D Furberg; B M Psaty; J Kirk
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.689

10.  Medicaid data as a resource for epidemiologic studies: strengths and limitations.

Authors:  R A Bright; J Avorn; D E Everitt
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 6.437

View more
  6 in total

1.  Evidence-based medicine: worship of form and treatment of high blood pressure.

Authors:  B M Psaty; C Rhoads; C D Furberg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Evidence-based medicine (EBM) in the treatment of hypertension in older patients.

Authors:  S Teramoto; H Kume; T Matsuse
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  [Pulse pressure as a marker of cardiovascular risk among the elderly].

Authors:  R Villa Estébanez; S Tranche Iparraguirre; R Marín Iranzo; M A Prieto Díaz; E Hevia Rodríguez
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 1.137

4.  Prescribing patterns of diuretics in multi-drug antihypertensive regimens.

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Michael L Johnson
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  Antihypertensive prescribing practices: impact of the antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial.

Authors:  Marty S Player; James M Gill; Heather Bittner Fagan; Arch G Mainous
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 6.  The economic impact of hypertension.

Authors:  William J Elliott
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.738

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.