BACKGROUND: The Perceived Need for Care Questionnaire (PNCQ) was designed for the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing. The PNCQ complemented collection of data on diagnosis and disability with the survey participants' perceptions of their needs for mental health care and the meeting of those needs. The four-stage design of the PNCQ mimics a conversational exploration of the topic of perceived needs. Five categories of perceived need are each assigned to one of four levels of perceived need (no need, unmet need, partially met need and met need). For unmet need and partially met need, information on barriers to care is collected. METHODS: Inter-rater reliabilities of perceived needs assessed by the PNCQ were examined in a study of 145 anxiety clinic attenders. Construct validity of these items was tested, using a multi-trait multi-method approach and hypotheses regarding extreme groups, in a study with a sample of 51 general practice and community psychiatric service patients. RESULTS: The instrument is brief to administer and has proved feasible for use in various settings. Inter-rater reliabilities for major categories, measured by the kappa statistic, exceeded 0.60 in most cases; for the summary category of all perceived needs, inter-rater reliability was 0.62. The multi-trait multi-method approach lent support to the construct validity of the instrument, as did findings in extreme groups. CONCLUSIONS: The PNCQ shows acceptable feasibility, reliability and validity, adding to the range of assessment tools available for epidemiological and health services research.
BACKGROUND: The Perceived Need for Care Questionnaire (PNCQ) was designed for the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing. The PNCQ complemented collection of data on diagnosis and disability with the survey participants' perceptions of their needs for mental health care and the meeting of those needs. The four-stage design of the PNCQ mimics a conversational exploration of the topic of perceived needs. Five categories of perceived need are each assigned to one of four levels of perceived need (no need, unmet need, partially met need and met need). For unmet need and partially met need, information on barriers to care is collected. METHODS: Inter-rater reliabilities of perceived needs assessed by the PNCQ were examined in a study of 145 anxiety clinic attenders. Construct validity of these items was tested, using a multi-trait multi-method approach and hypotheses regarding extreme groups, in a study with a sample of 51 general practice and community psychiatric service patients. RESULTS: The instrument is brief to administer and has proved feasible for use in various settings. Inter-rater reliabilities for major categories, measured by the kappa statistic, exceeded 0.60 in most cases; for the summary category of all perceived needs, inter-rater reliability was 0.62. The multi-trait multi-method approach lent support to the construct validity of the instrument, as did findings in extreme groups. CONCLUSIONS: The PNCQ shows acceptable feasibility, reliability and validity, adding to the range of assessment tools available for epidemiological and health services research.
Authors: Hilde P A van der Aa; Mirke Hoeben; Linda Rainey; Ger H M B van Rens; Hilde L Vreeken; Ruth M A van Nispen Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2014-11-15 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Robert H Pietrzak; Steven M Southwick; Melissa Tracy; Sandro Galea; Fran H Norris Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2012-01-28 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Thijs Fassaert; Matty A S de Wit; Wilco C Tuinebreijer; Arnoud P Verhoeff; Aartjan T F Beekman; Jack Dekker Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2008-09-11 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Sarah Turner; Tamara Taillieu; Kristene Cheung; Mark Zamorski; David Boulos; Jitender Sareen; Tracie O Afifi Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2017-03-22 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: Ilse Mj van Beljouw; Peter Fm Verhaak; Pim Cuijpers; Harm Wj van Marwijk; Brenda Wjh Penninx Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2010-10-20 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Jitender Sareen; Shay-Lee Belik; Tracie O Afifi; Gordon J G Asmundson; Brian J Cox; Murray B Stein Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2008-10-15 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Marijn A Prins; Peter F M Verhaak; Mirrian Smolders; Miranda G H Laurant; Klaas van der Meer; Peter Spreeuwenberg; Harm W J van Marwijk; Brenda W J H Penninx; Jozien M Bensing Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2010-01-05 Impact factor: 5.128