INTRODUCTION: Tuberculosis is a neglected cause of anal sepsis, often is not recognized, and therefore is not treated properly. METHOD: All patients were reviewed who had tuberculous anal sepsis diagnosed by histology reports of fistulectomy specimens or abscess scrapings from January 1990 to April 1999. RESULTS: Twenty patients (median age, 53 years; 18 males) with anal tuberculous sepsis were identified. They presented with abscesses (n = 2), abscesses and fistulas (n = 6), or fistulas (n = 12). All patients had a long history of anal complaints (3 months to 20 years), for which 15 patients were operated on previously. Nearly all fistulas (17/18) were complex, and secondary tracks or additional complicating features were common, even at first presentation. Eight patients had active concurrent pulmonary tuberculosis, and six showed evidence of previous pulmonary tuberculosis. Six patients had no signs of concurrent or previous tuberculosis elsewhere. Recurrence was observed only in cases where tuberculosis was initially not recognized, and antitubercular treatment therefore was not started. CONCLUSION: Contrary to views held previously, anal tubercular sepsis seems to have characteristic clinical features. It should be considered in cases of known pulmonary or extrapulmonary tuberculosis or if anal sepsis is persistent, recurrent, or complex in nature.
INTRODUCTION:Tuberculosis is a neglected cause of anal sepsis, often is not recognized, and therefore is not treated properly. METHOD: All patients were reviewed who had tuberculous anal sepsis diagnosed by histology reports of fistulectomy specimens or abscess scrapings from January 1990 to April 1999. RESULTS: Twenty patients (median age, 53 years; 18 males) with anal tuberculous sepsis were identified. They presented with abscesses (n = 2), abscesses and fistulas (n = 6), or fistulas (n = 12). All patients had a long history of anal complaints (3 months to 20 years), for which 15 patients were operated on previously. Nearly all fistulas (17/18) were complex, and secondary tracks or additional complicating features were common, even at first presentation. Eight patients had active concurrent pulmonary tuberculosis, and six showed evidence of previous pulmonary tuberculosis. Six patients had no signs of concurrent or previous tuberculosis elsewhere. Recurrence was observed only in cases where tuberculosis was initially not recognized, and antitubercular treatment therefore was not started. CONCLUSION: Contrary to views held previously, anal tubercular sepsis seems to have characteristic clinical features. It should be considered in cases of known pulmonary or extrapulmonary tuberculosis or if anal sepsis is persistent, recurrent, or complex in nature.