Literature DB >> 11088030

The utility of positron emission tomography for the diagnosis and staging of recurrent esophageal cancer.

P Flamen1, A Lerut, E Van Cutsem, J P Cambier, A Maes, W De Wever, M Peeters, P De Leyn, D Van Raemdonck, L Mortelmans.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the utility of whole-body positron emission tomography with (18)F-fluoro-deoxy-D -glucose (FDG-PET) for the evaluation of recurrence after curative resection of cancer of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction.
METHODS: Forty-one patients with a clinical or radiologic suspicion of recurrent disease underwent conventional diagnostic work-up, including a spiral computed tomographic scan, an endoscopic ultrasound, and a dedicated whole-body FDG-PET. PET lesions were classified as equivocal or suspicious recurrence. The conventional diagnostic work-up and PET findings were correlated with pathology or with radiologic and clinical follow-up. Equivocal lesions were classified as positive.
RESULTS: Forty recurrences were found in 33 patients. The lesions were perianastomotic (n = 9), regional (n = 12), and at distant sites (n = 19). For the diagnosis of a perianastomotic recurrence, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of FDG-PET were 100%, 57%, and 74%, versus 100%, 93%, and 96% for conventional diagnostic work-up, respectively (P = not significant). False-positive PET lesions were found in patients with a progressive anastomotic stenosis requiring repetitive endoscopic dilatation. For the diagnosis of regional and distant recurrences, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of PET were 94%, 82%, and 87%, versus 81% (P = not significant), 82% (P = not significant), and 81% (P =.0771) for conventional diagnostic work-up. All false-positive PET lesions (n = 4) had been reported as equivocal. On a patient base, PET provided additional information in 11 of 41 (27%) patients. A major impact on diagnosis was found in 5 patients with equivocal or negative findings on complete diagnostic work-up in whom PET provided a true-positive diagnosis. In 5 other patients the diagnosis was staged upward from localized to extended recurrent disease, and in 1 patient with an equivocal complete diagnostic work-up, PET correctly excluded malignancy.
CONCLUSION: FDG-PET allows a highly sensitive diagnosis and accurate whole-body staging of symptomatic recurrent esophageal cancer. Further studies in asymptomatic patients are needed to assess the potential benefit on survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11088030     DOI: 10.1067/mtc.2000.110464

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  26 in total

Review 1.  Multimodality therapy for gastroesophageal cancers.

Authors:  Kenneth K Wang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  PET: other thoracic malignancies.

Authors:  Leslie E Quint
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 3.909

3.  Surgical management of esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Amit N Patel; John T Preskitt; Joseph A Kuhn; Robert F Hebeler; Richard E Wood; Harold C Urschel
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2003-07

4.  The role of positron emission tomography in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Gary Y Yang; Timothy D Wagner; Blair A Jobe; Charles R Thomas
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2008-01

5.  Clinical course and outcome after esophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Shoji Natsugoe; Masataka Matsumoto; Hiroshi Okumura; Yasuto Uchikado; Tetsuro Setoyama; Ken Sasaki; Toshihide Sakurai; Itaru Omoto; Tetsuhiro Owaki; Hiroyuki Shinchi; Shinichi Ueno; Sumiya Ishigami
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Diagnostic accuracy of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for detection of suspected recurrence in patients with oesophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Punit Sharma; Sachin Jain; Sellam Karunanithi; Sujoy Pal; Pramod Kumar Julka; Sanjay Thulkar; Arun Malhotra; Chandrasekhar Bal; Rakesh Kumar
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography in adenocarcinomas of the distal esophagus and cardia.

Authors:  Katja Ott; Wolfgang A Weber; Ulrich Fink; Hermann Helmberger; Karen Becker; Hubert J Stein; James Müller; Markus Schwaiger; Jörg Rüdiger Siewert
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-08-18       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Positron emission tomography for staging esophageal cancer: does it lead to a different therapeutic approach?

Authors:  Werner Kneist; Mathias Schreckenberger; Peter Bartenstein; Frank Grünwald; Katja Oberholzer; Theodor Junginger
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-08-18       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 9.  PET/CT in oncology: for which tumours is it the reference standard?

Authors:  Conor D Collins
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 10.  Oesophageal cancer: assessment of response and follow up.

Authors:  S C Rankin
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.