Literature DB >> 11087650

Surgical treatment of gastric cancer invading the oesophagus.

F Bozzetti1, P Bignami, L Bertario, S Fissi, M Eboli.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: There is controversy regarding which type of surgical treatment is most appropriate for upper gastric cancer invading the oesophagus.
METHODS: A review of the pertinent literature was carried out regarding oesophageal involvement in gastric cancer.
RESULTS: Invasion of the oesophagus occurred in 26-63% of Western surgical series. It was more frequent in Borrmann IV type, linitis plastica, pT3-pT4, diffuse type by Lauren, N+ or tumours exceeding 5 cm in diameter. Lymphatic tumour spread was caudad (coeliac nodes, hepatoduodenal nodes, paraortic nodes) but mediastinal nodes were also involved if tumour growth in the oesophagus exceeded 3 cm or if there was transmural oesophageal infiltration. In Western countries there was less than 30% 5-year survival and no long-term survivors when hepatoduodenal or mediastinal nodes were metastatic. Mediastinal dissection through thoracotomy did not provide any benefit.
CONCLUSIONS: A rational approach involves total gastrectomy plus partial oesophagectomy. Abdominal transhiatal resection may be performed in the case of a localized, non-infiltrating tumour and oesophageal involvement <2 cm. However, infiltrating, poorly differentiated or Borrmann III-IV tumours require a right thoracotomy to achieve a longer margin of clearance. When oesophageal involvement is >3 cm, or hepatoduodenal or mediastinal nodes are positive, no surgical procedure is curative and the literature demonstrates that extended aggressive surgery has no benefits. Copyright 2000 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11087650     DOI: 10.1053/ejso.2000.1009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  7 in total

Review 1.  [R1 resection of esophageal carcinoma].

Authors:  I Gockel; C Wittekind
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Influence of a microscopic positive proximal margin in the treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma of the cardia.

Authors:  Jian-Guo Shen; Jae-Ho Cheong; Woo-Jin Hyung; Junuk Kim; Seung-Ho Choi; Sung-Hoon Noh
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction: influence of esophageal resection margin and operative approach on outcome.

Authors:  Andrew P Barbour; Nabil P Rizk; Mithat Gonen; Laura Tang; Manjit S Bains; Valerie W Rusch; Daniel G Coit; Murray F Brennan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Prognosis of upper-third gastric carcinoma patients with invasion of the lower esophagus.

Authors:  Seong Yeob Ryu; Jae Kyoon Joo; Jae Hyuk Lee; Dong Yi Kim
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Characteristics of gastric cancer with esophageal invasion and aspects of surgical treatment.

Authors:  Kohei Wakatsuki; Tomoyoshi Takayama; Masato Ueno; Sohei Matsumoto; Koji Enomoto; Tetsuya Tanaka; Yoshiyuki Nakajima
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Incidence of microscopically positive proximal margins in adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction.

Authors:  Fei Gao; Jia Chen; Tao Wang; Gang Wang; Zhihong Zhang; Lizong Shen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The length of proximal margin does not influence the prognosis of Siewert type II/III adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction after transhiatal curative gastrectomy.

Authors:  Fan Feng; Yangzi Tian; Guanghui Xu; Shushang Liu; Zhen Liu; Gaozan Zheng; Man Guo; Xiao Lian; Daiming Fan; Hongwei Zhang
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-05-11
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.