Literature DB >> 11087641

Method of specimen fixation and pathological dissection of colorectal cancer influences retrieval of lymph nodes and tumour nodal stage.

D N Poller1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: There is now evidence that meticulous specimen dissection may 'upstage' around one-quarter of colorectal cancers from node negative to node positive, although there is much debate as to how to achieve this: some authors prefer fat clearance techniques while others have opted for more conventional lymph-node retrieval with manual specimen 'breadknifing' and lymph-node palpation. While fat clearance is probably the optimum technique, it is time-consuming, costly and does not provide rapid diagnostic results.
METHODS: A prospective pathological study of 50 colorectal cancer resections was conducted with 100 comparison cases, the study group receiving at least an additional 24-h fixation of the mesocolonic or mesorectal fat in 10% aqueous formaldehyde prior to specimen dissection.
RESULTS: The percentage of node-negative colorectal cancer was significantly lower in the study group compared with the matched comparison group: (18) 36% compared with (55) 55% of comparison cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Effective lymph-node retrieval techniques require mesocolic/mesorectal fat to be adequately fixed prior to pathological dissection. This study suggests that satisfactory lymph-node retrieval is possible without fat clearance, provided the mesenteric fat is suitably fixed prior to colorectal cancer specimen dissection. Copyright 2000 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11087641     DOI: 10.1053/ejso.2000.0999

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  9 in total

1.  The influence of nodal size on the staging of colorectal carcinomas.

Authors:  G Cserni
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 2.  Nodal staging of colorectal carcinomas and sentinel nodes.

Authors:  G Cserni
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 3.  A nodal positivity constant: new perspectives in lymph node evaluation and colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Niamh M Hogan; Desmond C Winter
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  N staging: the role of the pathologist.

Authors:  Costanza De Marco; Alberto Biondi; Riccardo Ricci
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-02-20

5.  Oncologic specimen from laparoscopic assisted gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma is comparable to D1-open surgery: the experience of a Canadian centre.

Authors:  Julie Hallet; Saber Labidi; Antoine Bouchard-Fortier; Ariane Clairoux; Jean-Pierre Gagné
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 6.  Sentinel lymph node mapping in colon cancer.

Authors:  J-J Tuech; P Pessaux; N Regenet; R Bergamaschi; A Colson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Tumor micrometastases in mesorectal lymph nodes and their clinical significance in patients with rectal caner.

Authors:  Yang-Chun Zheng; Yu-Ying Tang; Zong-Guang Zhou; Li Li; Tian-Cai Wang; Yi-Ling Deng; Dai-Yun Chen; Wei-Ping Liu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Multicentre review of lymph node harvest in colorectal cancer: are we understaging colorectal cancer patients?

Authors:  P J Mitchell; S Ravi; B Grifftiths; F Reid; D Speake; C Midgley; N Mapstone
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Will Rogers revisited: prospective observational study of survival of 3592 patients with colorectal cancer according to number of nodes examined by pathologists.

Authors:  S George; J Primrose; R Talbot; J Smith; M Mullee; D Bailey; C du Boulay; H Jordan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-09-12       Impact factor: 7.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.