Literature DB >> 11086814

Acoustic evoked response following transection of the eighth nerve in the rat.

S K Rosahl1, M Tatagiba, A Gharabaghi, C Matthies, M Samii.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The auditory brainstem response (ABR) is the most widely used means of intra-operative monitoring of the integrity of the auditory nerve and brainstem pathways during surgery in the cerebellopontine angle (CPA). Reliability of this and other electrophysiological techniques has been questioned because of persisting potentials in direct nerve recordings despite complete eighth nerve section. The study was designed to assess the extent to which an acoustic evoked response persists after the cochlear nerve is lesioned in the CPA of the adult rat.
METHODS: The eighth nerve was exposed microsurgically via a lateral suboccipital approach without damage to surrounding structures. The auditory brainstem response to monaurally presented click stimuli was recorded using needle electrodes and a bandpass of 10 to 5000 Hz.
FINDINGS: Complete sharp sectioning of the nerve in the CPA resulted in immediate disappearance of brainstem-generated potentials but persistence of a large primary, vertex-positive wave in all but one case. This response was also abolished in recordings three days later and after emptying the inner ear canal. Provided that the cochlea remained intact, two weeks later a single, vertex-positive potential in the latency range of wave Ia of the ABR reappeared, reaching its peak amplitude six weeks after sectioning of the nerve.
CONCLUSIONS: The short-latency electrical potential recorded following damage of the eighth nerve in the cerebellopontine angle can be mistaken for an indication that nerve function is still preserved. The evoked injury potential is probably the major contributor to this potential that resembles wave I of the ABR. Monitoring of functional auditory integrity must neither be limited to early components of the ABR, nor to the electrocochleogram (EcoG) and the peripheral compound nerve action potential (CNAP), respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11086814     DOI: 10.1007/s007010070060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  5 in total

1.  Using concha electrodes to measure cochlear microphonic waveforms and auditory brainstem responses.

Authors:  Ming Zhang
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-12-03

2.  Intraoperative monitoring of hearing during cerebellopontine angle tumor surgery using transtympanic electrocochleography.

Authors:  Krzysztof F Morawski; Kazimierz Niemczyk; Jorge Bohorquez; Andrzej Marchel; Rafael E Delgado; Ozcan Ozdamar; Fred F Telischi
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Long-term evolution of brainstem electrical evoked responses to sound after restricted ablation of the auditory cortex.

Authors:  Verónica Lamas; Juan C Alvarado; Juan Carro; Miguel A Merchán
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Hearing assessment during deep brain stimulation of the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus and dentate cerebellar nucleus in rat.

Authors:  Jasper V Smit; Ali Jahanshahi; Marcus L F Janssen; Robert J Stokroos; Yasin Temel
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 5.  Intra-operative hearing monitoring methods in middle ear surgeries.

Authors:  Wei Ren; Fei Ji; Jialing Zeng; Hui Zhao
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2017-02-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.