Literature DB >> 11084647

Cranial sutures as intramembranous bone growth sites.

L A Opperman1.   

Abstract

Intramembranous bone growth is achieved through bone formation within a periosteum or by bone formation at sutures. Sutures are formed during embryonic development at the sites of approximation of the membranous bones of the craniofacial skeleton. They serve as the major sites of bone expansion during postnatal craniofacial growth. For sutures to function as intramembranous bone growth sites, they need to remain in an unossified state, yet allow new bone to be formed at the edges of the overlapping bone fronts. This process relies on the production of sufficient new bone cells to be recruited into the bone fronts, while ensuring that the cells within the suture remain undifferentiated. Unlike endochondral growth plates, which expand through chondrocyte hypertrophy, sutures do not have intrinsic growth potential. Rather, they produce new bone at the sutural edges of the bone fronts in response to external stimuli, such as signals arising from the expanding neurocranium. This process allows growth of the cranial vault to be coordinated with growth of the neurocranium. Too little or delayed bone growth will result in wide-open fontanels and suture agenesis, whereas too much or accelerated bone growth will result in osseous obliteration of the sutures or craniosynostosis. Craniosynostosis in humans, suture fusion in animals, and induced suture obliteration in vitro has been associated with mutations or alterations in expression of several transcription factors, growth factors, and their receptors. Much of the data concerning signaling within sutures has been garnered from research on cranial sutures; hence, only the cranial sutures will be discussed in detail in this review. This review synthesizes classic descriptions of suture growth and pathology with modern molecular analysis of genetics and cell function in normal and abnormal suture morphogenesis and growth in a unifying hypothesis. At the same time, the reader is reminded of the importance of the suture as an intramembranous bone growth site. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11084647     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0177(2000)9999:9999<::AID-DVDY1073>3.0.CO;2-F

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Dyn        ISSN: 1058-8388            Impact factor:   3.780


  165 in total

1.  Hedgehog-dependent proliferation drives modular growth during morphogenesis of a dermal bone.

Authors:  Tyler R Huycke; B Frank Eames; Charles B Kimmel
Journal:  Development       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 6.868

2.  The balance of WNT and FGF signaling influences mesenchymal stem cell fate during skeletal development.

Authors:  Takamitsu Maruyama; Anthony J Mirando; Chu-Xia Deng; Wei Hsu
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 8.192

3.  Jagged1 functions downstream of Twist1 in the specification of the coronal suture and the formation of a boundary between osteogenic and non-osteogenic cells.

Authors:  Hai-Yun Yen; Man-Chun Ting; Robert E Maxson
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 3.582

4.  Integration of comprehensive 3D microCT and signaling analysis reveals differential regulatory mechanisms of craniofacial bone development.

Authors:  Thach-Vu Ho; Junichi Iwata; Hoang Anh Ho; Weston C Grimes; Shery Park; Pedro A Sanchez-Lara; Yang Chai
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 3.582

5.  Assessing age-related ossification of the petro-occipital fissure: laying the foundation for understanding the clinicopathologies of the cranial base.

Authors:  Armand L Balboni; Thomas L Estenson; Joy S Reidenberg; Andrew D Bergemann; Jeffrey T Laitman
Journal:  Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol       Date:  2005-01

Review 6.  Relations and interactions between cranial mesoderm and neural crest populations.

Authors:  Drew M Noden; Paul A Trainor
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  Modelling human skull growth: a validated computational model.

Authors:  Joseph Libby; Arsalan Marghoub; David Johnson; Roman H Khonsari; Michael J Fagan; Mehran Moazen
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 8.  Pathology in metopic synostosis.

Authors:  Pinar Karabagli
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 1.475

9.  Central nervous system phenotypes in craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Kristina Aldridge; Jeffrey L Marsh; Daniel Govier; Joan T Richtsmeier
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.610

10.  Postnatal brain and skull growth in an Apert syndrome mouse model.

Authors:  Cheryl A Hill; Neus Martínez-Abadías; Susan M Motch; Jordan R Austin; Yingli Wang; Ethylin Wang Jabs; Joan T Richtsmeier; Kristina Aldridge
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 2.802

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.