Literature DB >> 11084105

Current status of dual-sensor pacemaker systems for correction of chronotropic incompetence.

C W Israel1, S H Hohnloser.   

Abstract

Rate-adaptive pacing has been shown to improve exercise capacity in patients with chronotropic incompetence. However, all sensors used to adapt the pacing rate to meet metabolic demands show typical limitations. To overcome these, concepts using 2 sensors for rate adaptation have been developed, combining an unspecific but fast-reacting sensor with a specific but slower-reacting one. Clinical performance of these dual-sensor pacemaker systems is related to 3 factors: (1) choice of sensors, (2) mode of sensor integration, and (3) algorithms for automatic optimization of the integrated sensor response. Clinical studies using dual-sensor rate-adaptive pacing systems have demonstrated their ability to mimic normal sinus rate during different forms of exercise, avoiding inadequate or delayed rate response. However, to avoid combining the disadvantages of both single sensors, dual-sensor rate-adaptive systems need effective automatic algorithms. Sensor cross-check should be quick and combine fast reactivity and high specificity, particularly so as to prevent overpacing. Programmable rate response-related parameters should continuously be optimized. The pacemaker should provide diagnostic facilities during exercise to simulate short-term sensor performance at different settings and memory functions to evaluate long-term sensor performance. Assessment and eventually deactivation of all automatic functions should be possible. Finally, even with automatic algorithms for sensor optimization, maximal benefit from a dual-sensor system can only be achieved if the physician is able to identify and correct pitfalls of each system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11084105     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(00)01188-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  6 in total

Review 1.  Is Cryo a Better Energy Source Than Radiofrequency for AF Ablation in Preventing Esophageal Injury?

Authors:  Pawan K Arora; James C Hansen; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Boaz Avitall
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2009-04-01

Review 2.  Athletes with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators.

Authors:  Shiva P Ponamgi; Christopher V DeSimone; Michael J Ackerman
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.182

Review 3.  Current state of the art for cardiac arrhythmia gene therapy.

Authors:  J Kevin Donahue
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 12.310

4.  AV Interval Optimization - A Step Towards Physiological Pacing in Patients with Normal Left Ventricular Function.

Authors:  Shomu Bohora
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2010-09-05

5.  [Sport for pacemaker patients].

Authors:  C W Israel
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2012-06

6.  Assessment of adaptive rate response provided by accelerometer, minute ventilation and dual sensor compared with normal sinus rhythm during exercise: a self-controlled study in chronotropically competent subjects.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Cao; Yiqun Zhang; Yangang Su; Jin Bai; Wei Wang; Junbo Ge
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 2.628

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.