Literature DB >> 11083699

Nasal continuous positive airway pressure devices do not maintain the set pressure dynamically when tested under simulated clinical conditions.

J P Bacon1, R J Farney, R L Jensen, J M Walker, T V Cloward.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is standard therapy for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. The effective nasal mask pressure may be adversely affected by factors that increase system resistance (eg, long tubing and/or water condensation) and by dynamic variables (breathing frequency [f] and tidal volume [VT]). The present study was conducted in order to assess the performance of CPAP machines throughout a range of simulated clinical conditions.
DESIGN: Four currently used CPAP machines were tested at settings of 5, 10, 15, and 20 cm H(2)O using a pulmonary waveform generator to produce VTs of 0.4, 0.8, and 1.2 L at frequencies of 10, 20, and 30 breaths/min. Machines were tested under five conditions: 6-foot and 12-foot tubing, with and without an in-line humidifier, and 12-foot tubing with humidifier and water condensation. MEASUREMENTS: Maximum and minimum mask pressure measurements were obtained during five respiratory cycles for each dynamic variable under each of the five conditions and CPAP settings (180 experiments on each of four CPAP models).
RESULTS: Using typical clinical parameters (VT, 0.4 L and 0.8 L; f, 10 breaths/min and 20 breaths/min; and CPAP, 5 to 15 cm H(2)O), mask pressure consistently varied above and below the set point when additional tubing and/or a humidifier were added to the system (0.7 to 2.9 cm H(2)O below and 0.5 to 1.0 cm H(2)O above the set pressure). Water condensation caused large pressure deviations (inspiratory pressure ranged from 3.5 to 5.6 cm H(2)O below set pressure, and expiratory pressure ranged from 0.7 to 3.5 cm H(2)O above set pressure).
CONCLUSIONS: Therapy and compliance could be adversely affected because some CPAP machines in current use do not maintain constant continuous mask pressure when tested using simulated conditions, especially when water condenses in the tubing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11083699     DOI: 10.1378/chest.118.5.1441

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  2 in total

1.  Effect of tubing condensate on non-invasive positive pressure ventilators tested under simulated clinical conditions.

Authors:  Diana Elizabeth Hart; Mark Forman; Andrew G Veale
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 2.816

Review 2.  Positive pressure therapy: a perspective on evidence-based outcomes and methods of application.

Authors:  Mark H Sanders; Josep M Montserrat; Ramon Farré; Rachel J Givelber
Journal:  Proc Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2008-02-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.