Literature DB >> 11083686

Evaluation of polymerase chain reaction, adenosine deaminase, and interferon-gamma in pleural fluid for the differential diagnosis of pleural tuberculosis.

M V Villegas1, L A Labrada, N G Saravia.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: Pleural tuberculosis (TB) is a diagnostic challenge because of its nonspecific clinical presentation and paucibacillary nature. The inefficiency of conventional laboratory methods and the reliance on pleural biopsy have motivated the evaluation of alternative diagnostic strategies. We have evaluated polymerase chain reaction (PCR) directed to the IS6110 sequence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the determination of adenosine deaminase (ADA) activity, and measurement of interferon (IFN)-gamma levels in pleural fluid in the diagnosis of pleural TB. PATIENTS: ADA activity, IFN-gamma levels, and PCR were evaluated in 140 cases of pleural effusion, 42 with confirmed pleural TB, 19 with probable pleural TB, 70 with a nontuberculous etiology, and 9 having an undetermined etiology.
RESULTS: ADA activity, IFN-gamma levels, and PCR were 88%, 85.7%, and 73.8% sensitive, respectively, and 85.7%, 97.1%, and 90% specific, respectively, for pleural TB that had been confirmed by either culture or pleural biopsy specimens. The combination of PCR, IFN-gamma measurement, and ADA activity determination allowed the selective increase of sensitivity and specificity for probable and confirmed cases compared to individual methods. Positive and negative predictive values for these individual or combined methods were maintained over a wide range of prevalence of pleural TB in the patient population presenting with pleural effusions. Fever and younger age were associated with tuberculous pleural effusion (p < 0. 0001), while blood in sputum and older age were associated with malignant etiology (p < 0.008).
CONCLUSIONS: These clinical variables together with the use of ADA activity determination, PCR, and measurement of IFN-gamma levels provide the basis for the rapid and efficient diagnosis of pleural TB in different clinical settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11083686     DOI: 10.1378/chest.118.5.1355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  31 in total

1.  Cytokine polarization in miliary and pleural tuberculosis.

Authors:  Surendra K Sharma; Dipender K Mitra; Arumugam Balamurugan; Ravindra M Pandey; Narinder K Mehra
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 8.317

2.  Early detection of negative BACTEC MGIT 960 cultures by PCR-reverse cross-blot hybridization assay.

Authors:  Lucio Romano; Maurizio Sanguinetti; Brunella Posteraro; Fausta Ardito; Giovanni Gesu; Anna Maria Schito; Giovanni Fadda
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Molecular diagnostics in tuberculosis.

Authors:  V C C Cheng; W W Yew; K Y Yuen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 4.  Tuberculous pleural effusions: advances and controversies.

Authors:  Morné J Vorster; Brian W Allwood; Andreas H Diacon; Coenraad F N Koegelenberg
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Increased pleural soluble fas ligand (sFasL) levels in tuberculosis pleurisy and its relation with T-helper type 1 cytokines.

Authors:  Ferah Budak; Esra Kunt Uzaslan; Sengül Cangür; Güher Göral; Haluk Barbaros Oral
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 2.584

6.  Tuberculosis of the breast.

Authors:  Salim Baharoon
Journal:  Ann Thorac Med       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.219

7.  Assessment of the N-PCR assay in diagnosis of pleural tuberculosis: detection of M. tuberculosis in pleural fluid and sputum collected in tandem.

Authors:  Parameet Kumar; Manas K Sen; Devendra S Chauhan; Vishwa M Katoch; Sarman Singh; Hanumanthappa K Prasad
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Alkaline phosphatase: Distinguishing between tuberculous and nontuberculous pleural effusion.

Authors:  Ashish Anantrao Jadhav; Jayashree Suhas Bardapurkar; Anuradha Jain
Journal:  Lung India       Date:  2009-07

Review 9.  New diagnostic methods for tuberculosis.

Authors:  Melissa R Nyendak; Deborah A Lewinsohn; David M Lewinsohn
Journal:  Curr Opin Infect Dis       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.915

10.  Markers for differentiation of tubercular pleural effusion from non-tubercular effusion.

Authors:  Vivek Ambade; M M Arora; S P Rai; S K Nikumb; D R Basannar
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-10-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.