Literature DB >> 11082822

Stages of change versus addiction: a replication and extension.

D B Abrams1, T A Herzog, K M Emmons, L Linnan.   

Abstract

Data from the Working Well trial (n = 2379) were used to test the capacity of 19 variables to predict smoking cessation at 1- and 2-year follow-ups. Among the core constructs of transtheoretical model (TTM), stage of change was the best predictor. The processes of change and the pros and cons of smoking were relatively ineffective predictors. Among other variables, self-efficacy, cigarettes per day, duration of longest quit attempt during the previous year, and the contemplation ladder were the most effective stand-alone predictors. A composite of cigarettes per day and quit duration was particularly effective for predicting cessation. Consistent with Farkas et al. (Farkas AJ, Pierce JP, Zhu SH, Rosbrook B, Gilpin EA, Berry C, Kaplan RM, Addiction 91:1271-1280, 1996), multivariate analyses including the composite variable (cigarettes per day and quit duration) and the stages of change revealed the composite variable to be the better predictor of cessation.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11082822     DOI: 10.1080/14622200050147484

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  39 in total

1.  Predictors of smoking reduction outcomes in a sample of 287 patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Bo-Jian Wu; Tsuo-Hung Lan
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 5.270

Review 2.  A systematic review of interventions for smokers who contact quitlines.

Authors:  Lindsay F Stead; Rafael Perera; Tim Lancaster
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  "Real-world" effectiveness of reactive telephone counseling for smoking cessation: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Akshay Sood; Jennifer Andoh; Steven Verhulst; Mathany Ganesh; Billie Edson; Patricia Hopkins-Price
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Modeling attitude towards drug treament: the role of internal motivation, external pressure, and dramatic relief.

Authors:  Bradley T Conner; Douglas Longshore; M Douglas Anglin
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 1.505

5.  Status and Future Directions of Preclinical Behavioral Pharmacology in Tobacco Regulatory Science.

Authors:  Mark G LeSage; John R Smethells; Andrew C Harris
Journal:  Behav Anal (Wash D C)       Date:  2018-07-09

6.  Does Smoking Intensity Predict Cessation Rates? A Study of Light-Intermittent, Light-Daily, and Heavy Smokers Enrolled in Two Telephone-Based Counseling Interventions.

Authors:  Katherine Ni; Binhuan Wang; Alissa R Link; Scott E Sherman
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 4.244

7.  Group-randomized trial of a proactive, personalized telephone counseling intervention for adolescent smoking cessation.

Authors:  Arthur V Peterson; Kathleen A Kealey; Sue L Mann; Patrick M Marek; Evette J Ludman; Jingmin Liu; Jonathan B Bricker
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Relationship between momentary affect states and self-efficacy in adolescent smokers.

Authors:  Bettina B Hoeppner; Christopher W Kahler; Chad J Gwaltney
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 4.267

9.  Baseline stage, severity, and effort effects differentiate stable smokers from maintainers and relapsers.

Authors:  Colleen A Redding; James O Prochaska; Andrea Paiva; Joseph S Rossi; Wayne Velicer; Bryan J Blissmer; Geoffrey W Greene; Mark L Robbins; Xiaowu Sun
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 2.164

10.  Self-efficacy and smoking cessation: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chad J Gwaltney; Jane Metrik; Christopher W Kahler; Saul Shiffman
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2009-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.