Literature DB >> 11082500

Selective opioid agonist and antagonist competition for [3H]-naloxone binding in amphibian spinal cord.

L C Newman1, D R Wallace, C W Stevens.   

Abstract

Opioids elicit antinociception in mammals through three distinct types of receptors designated as mu, kappa and delta. However, it is not clear what type of opioid receptor mediates antinociception in non-mammalian vertebrates. Radioligand binding techniques were employed to characterize the site(s) of opioid action in the amphibian, Rana pipiens. Naloxone is a general opioid antagonist that has not been characterized in Rana pipiens. Using the non-selective opioid antagonist, [3H]-naloxone, opioid binding sites were characterized in amphibian spinal cord. Competitive binding assays were done using selective opioid agonists and highly-selective opioid antagonists. Naloxone bound to a single-site with an affinity of 11.3 nM and 18.7 nM for kinetic and saturation studies, respectively. A B(max) value of 2725 fmol/mg protein in spinal cord was observed. The competition constants (K(i)) of unlabeled mu, kappa and delta ranged from 2.58 nM to 84 microM. The highly-selective opioid antagonists yielded similar K(i) values ranging from 5.37 to 31.1 nM. These studies are the first to examine opioid binding in amphibian spinal cord. In conjunction with previous behavioral data, these results suggest that non-mammalian vertebrates express a unique opioid receptor which mediates the action of selective mu, kappa and delta opioid agonists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11082500      PMCID: PMC3062938          DOI: 10.1016/s0006-8993(00)02967-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  41 in total

1.  The effects of morphine- and nalorphine- like drugs in the nondependent and morphine-dependent chronic spinal dog.

Authors:  W R Martin; C G Eades; J A Thompson; R E Huppler; P E Gilbert
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 4.030

2.  Discrimination of three opiate receptor binding sites with the use of a computerized curve-fitting technique.

Authors:  A Pfeiffer; A Herz
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 4.436

3.  Multiple opiate receptors: phylogenetic differences.

Authors:  M C Buatti; G W Pasternak
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1981-08-10       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  The nature of opiate receptors in toad brain.

Authors:  E J Simon; J M Hiller; J Groth; Y Itzhak; M J Holland; S G Beck
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1982 Sep 20-27       Impact factor: 5.037

5.  Relationship between the inhibition constant (K1) and the concentration of inhibitor which causes 50 per cent inhibition (I50) of an enzymatic reaction.

Authors:  Y Cheng; W H Prusoff
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1973-12-01       Impact factor: 5.858

6.  Phylogenetic distribution of opiate receptor binding.

Authors:  C B Pert; D Aposhian; S H Snyder
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1974-07-26       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Selective opioid receptor agonist and antagonist displacement of [3H]naloxone binding in amphibian brain.

Authors:  L C Newman; D R Wallace; C W Stevens
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2000-06-02       Impact factor: 4.432

8.  Endogenous opioid peptides: multiple agonists and receptors.

Authors:  J A Lord; A A Waterfield; J Hughes; H W Kosterlitz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1977-06-09       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Morphine-induced analgesia and explosive motor behavior in an amphibian.

Authors:  P D Pezalla
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1983-08-29       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Comparison of the binding characteristics of tritiated opiates and opioid peptides.

Authors:  M G Gillan; H W Kosterlitz; S J Paterson
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 8.739

View more
  8 in total

1.  Testing and comparison of non-opioid analgesics in amphibians.

Authors:  C W Stevens; D N MacIver; L C Newman
Journal:  Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2001-07

Review 2.  Analgesia in amphibians: preclinical studies and clinical applications.

Authors:  Craig W Stevens
Journal:  Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract       Date:  2011-01

3.  Single Amino Acid Variation Underlies Species-Specific Sensitivity to Amphibian Skin-Derived Opioid-like Peptides.

Authors:  Eyal Vardy; Maria F Sassano; Andrew J Rennekamp; Wesley K Kroeze; Philip D Mosier; Richard B Westkaemper; Craig W Stevens; Vsevolod Katritch; Raymond C Stevens; Randall T Peterson; Bryan L Roth
Journal:  Chem Biol       Date:  2015-06-18

4.  Xendorphin B1, a novel opioid-like peptide determined from a Xenopus laevis brain cDNA library, produces opioid antinociception after spinal administration in amphibians.

Authors:  Craig W Stevens; Géza Tóth; Anna Borsodi; Sándor Benyhe
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2007-01-04       Impact factor: 4.077

5.  Comparison of buprenorphine and butorphanol analgesia in the eastern red-spotted newt (Notophthalmus viridescens).

Authors:  Craig A Koeller
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.232

6.  Systemic and spinal administration of the mu opioid, remifentanil, produces antinociception in amphibians.

Authors:  Shekher Mohan; Craig W Stevens
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2006-02-17       Impact factor: 4.432

Review 7.  Opioid research in amphibians: an alternative pain model yielding insights on the evolution of opioid receptors.

Authors:  Craig W Stevens
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  2004-10

Review 8.  The evolution of vertebrate opioid receptors.

Authors:  Craig W Stevens
Journal:  Front Biosci (Landmark Ed)       Date:  2009-01-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.