Y Toyoda1, V Di Gregorio, R A Parker, S Levitsky, J D McCully. 1. Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Biometrics Center, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adenosine-enhanced ischemic preconditioning (APC) extends the protection afforded by ischemic preconditioning (IPC) by both significantly decreasing infarct size and significantly enhancing post-ischemic functional recovery. In this study, the anti-infarct effects and the anti-stunning effects of APC in contributing to enhanced post-ischemic functional recovery were determined and compared with IPC. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sheep (n=96) were subjected to 15, 30, 45, or 60 minutes of regional ischemia and 120 minutes of reperfusion. IPC hearts received 5 minutes of regional ischemia and 5 minutes of reperfusion before ischemia/reperfusion. APC hearts received a bolus injection of adenosine coincident with IPC. Adenosine hearts (ADO) received a bolus injection of adenosine before ischemia/reperfusion. Regional ischemia (RI) hearts received no pretreatment. Infarct size/area at risk was determined by tetrazolium staining. Regional myocardial function was determined by sonomicrometry. Segment shortening after 15 minutes of ischemia in which no infarct was incurred was 32. 1+/-10.6% in RI, 70.6+/-8.5% in IPC, and 77.4+/-6.0% in APC hearts. Segment shortening after 30 minutes of ischemia was 60.7+/-6.3% in APC hearts (P:<0.05 versus RI, ADO, IPC) but was <37% in all other groups. Infarct size/area at risk after 30 and 60 minutes of ischemia was, respectively, 25.8+/-5.7% and 49.8+/-6.0% in RI, 12. 9+/-3.0% and 29.2+/-5.0% in ADO, 11.6+/-2.4% and 24.6+/-2.7% in IPC, and 5.1+/-1.6% and 12.4+/-2.0% in APC hearts (P:<0.05 versus RI, ADO, IPC). CONCLUSIONS: APC and IPC exhibit anti-infarct and anti-stunning effects in the ovine heart, but these effects are rapidly diminished with IPC. APC significantly extends these effects, providing for significantly enhanced infarct size reduction and post-ischemic functional recovery (P:<0.05 versus IPC).
BACKGROUND:Adenosine-enhanced ischemic preconditioning (APC) extends the protection afforded by ischemic preconditioning (IPC) by both significantly decreasing infarct size and significantly enhancing post-ischemic functional recovery. In this study, the anti-infarct effects and the anti-stunning effects of APC in contributing to enhanced post-ischemic functional recovery were determined and compared with IPC. METHODS AND RESULTS:Sheep (n=96) were subjected to 15, 30, 45, or 60 minutes of regional ischemia and 120 minutes of reperfusion. IPC hearts received 5 minutes of regional ischemia and 5 minutes of reperfusion before ischemia/reperfusion. APC hearts received a bolus injection of adenosine coincident with IPC. Adenosine hearts (ADO) received a bolus injection of adenosine before ischemia/reperfusion. Regional ischemia (RI) hearts received no pretreatment. Infarct size/area at risk was determined by tetrazolium staining. Regional myocardial function was determined by sonomicrometry. Segment shortening after 15 minutes of ischemia in which no infarct was incurred was 32. 1+/-10.6% in RI, 70.6+/-8.5% in IPC, and 77.4+/-6.0% in APC hearts. Segment shortening after 30 minutes of ischemia was 60.7+/-6.3% in APC hearts (P:<0.05 versus RI, ADO, IPC) but was <37% in all other groups. Infarct size/area at risk after 30 and 60 minutes of ischemia was, respectively, 25.8+/-5.7% and 49.8+/-6.0% in RI, 12. 9+/-3.0% and 29.2+/-5.0% in ADO, 11.6+/-2.4% and 24.6+/-2.7% in IPC, and 5.1+/-1.6% and 12.4+/-2.0% in APC hearts (P:<0.05 versus RI, ADO, IPC). CONCLUSIONS:APC and IPC exhibit anti-infarct and anti-stunning effects in the ovine heart, but these effects are rapidly diminished with IPC. APC significantly extends these effects, providing for significantly enhanced infarct size reduction and post-ischemic functional recovery (P:<0.05 versus IPC).
Authors: James D McCully; Monoj K Bhasin; Christian Daly; Manuel C Guerrero; Simon Dillon; Towia A Liberman; Douglas B Cowan; John D Mably; Francis X McGowan; Sidney Levitsky Journal: Physiol Genomics Date: 2009-05-19 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Robert M Osipov; Cesario Bianchi; Jun Feng; Richard T Clements; Yuhong Liu; Michael P Robich; Hilary P Glazer; Neel R Sodha; Frank W Sellke Journal: Circulation Date: 2009-09-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Robert M Osipov; Michael P Robich; Jun Feng; Richard T Clements; Yuhong Liu; Hilary P Glazer; John Wagstaff; Cesario Bianchi; Frank W Sellke Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2009-04-16
Authors: James D McCully; Douglas B Cowan; Christina A Pacak; Ioannis K Toumpoulis; Haripriya Dayalan; Sidney Levitsky Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2008-10-31 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Borami Shin; Mossab Y Saeed; Jesse J Esch; Alvise Guariento; David Blitzer; Kamila Moskowitzova; Giovanna Ramirez-Barbieri; Arzoo Orfany; Jerusha K Thedsanamoorthy; Douglas B Cowan; James A Inkster; Erin R Snay; Steven J Staffa; Alan B Packard; David Zurakowski; Pedro J Del Nido; James D McCully Journal: JACC Basic Transl Sci Date: 2019-12-23