Literature DB >> 11082372

Socioeconomic status is an important determinant of the use of invasive procedures after acute myocardial infarction in New York State.

E F Philbin1, P A McCullough, T G DiSalvo, G W Dec, P L Jenkins, W D Weaver.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient and hospital characteristics influence the use of invasive cardiac procedures. Whether socioeconomic status (SES) has an influence that is independent of these other determinants is unclear. The purpose of the present study was to examine the influence of household income as a measure of SES on the use of invasive cardiac procedures among a large group of patients with acute myocardial infarction. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We analyzed administrative discharge data from 231 nonfederal acute care hospitals in New York State that involved 28 698 black or white inpatients with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code 410.XX in the principal diagnosis position between January 1 and December 31, 1995. Household income was derived from postal ZIP codes and census data. The use of cardiac catheterization, PTCA, CABG, and any revascularization procedure was examined across groups stratified by income. Patients who resided in lower-income neighborhoods were more often female or black, had a higher prevalence of coexistent illness, had a higher use of Medicaid insurance, and were less often admitted to urban hospitals or hospitals that provide on-site CABG and PTCA. Crude and adjusted odds ratios for catheterization, PTCA, CABG, and any revascularization procedure were related to income in a graded fashion. After adjustment, patients in the highest quintile of income were 22% more likely to undergo catheterization, 74% more likely to undergo PTCA, 48% more likely to undergo CABG, and 76% more likely to undergo any revascularization procedure than were patients in the lowest quintile. The difference in cardiac catheterization did not fully account for income-based differences in revascularization, because income remained a significant determinant of revascularization after accounting for whether a catheterization was performed. Even among patients treated in hospitals that provide on-site CABG and PTCA, income was a significant determinant of procedures.
CONCLUSIONS: Lower-income patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction are more often female or black, have more coexisting illnesses, and are less often admitted to urban hospitals or hospitals that provide CABG and PTCA. Even after adjustment for these and other factors, lower income is a negative predictor of procedure use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11082372     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.102.suppl_3.iii-107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  35 in total

1.  Racial differences in clinical presentation of patients with sleep-disordered breathing.

Authors:  Steven M Scharf; Lawrence Seiden; Jennifer DeMore; Olivia Carter-Pokras
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.816

2.  Evaluating options for measurement of neighborhood socioeconomic context: evidence from a myocardial infarction case-control study.

Authors:  Gina S Lovasi; Anne Vernez Moudon; Nicholas L Smith; Thomas Lumley; Eric B Larson; Dong W Sohn; David S Siscovick; Bruce M Psaty
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 4.078

3.  ASCI 2010 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography: a report of the Asian Society of Cardiovascular Imaging Cardiac Computed Tomography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guideline Working Group.

Authors:  I-Chen Tsai; Byoung Wook Choi; Carmen Chan; Masahiro Jinzaki; Kakuya Kitagawa; Hwan Seok Yong; Wei Yu
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Socioeconomic status, treatment, and outcomes among elderly patients hospitalized with heart failure: findings from the National Heart Failure Project.

Authors:  Saif S Rathore; Frederick A Masoudi; Yongfei Wang; Jeptha P Curtis; JoAnne M Foody; Edward P Havranek; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Neighborhood socioeconomic and racial disparities in angiography and coronary revascularization: the ARIC surveillance study.

Authors:  Kathryn M Rose; Randi E Foraker; Gerardo Heiss; Wayne D Rosamond; Chirayath M Suchindran; Eric A Whitsel
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 3.797

6.  Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Does a Patient-centered Educational Intervention Affect African-American Access to Knee Replacement? A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Widening social inequalities in risk for sudden infant death syndrome.

Authors:  Kate E Pickett; Ye Luo; Diane S Lauderdale
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Sex, race, and insurance status differences in hospital treatment and outcomes following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Scott D Casey; Bryn E Mumma
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 5.262

9.  Does supplemental private insurance affect care of Medicare recipients hospitalized for myocardial infarction?

Authors:  Jing Fang; Michael H Alderman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Universal health care no guarantee of equity: comparison of socioeconomic inequalities in the receipt of coronary procedures in patients with acute myocardial infarction and angina.

Authors:  Rosemary J Korda; Mark S Clements; Chris W Kelman
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.