Literature DB >> 11082365

Quality of life after aortic valve replacement at the age of >80 years.

T M Sundt1, M S Bailey, M R Moon, E N Mendeloff, C B Huddleston, M K Pasque, H B Barner, W A Gay.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal management of aortic valve disease in patients >80 years old depends on functional outcome as well as operative risks and late survival. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We retrospectively identified 133 patients (62 men, 71 women) aged 80 to 91 years (mean 84+/-3 years) who underwent aortic valve replacement alone or in combination with another procedure between January 1, 1993, and April 31, 1998. Demographics included hypertension 68%, diabetes mellitus 17%, and history of stroke 11%. Operative (30 day) mortality rate was 11%. Urgent or emergent surgery, aortic insufficiency, and perioperative stroke or renal dysfunction were risk factors for operative death by multivariable analysis. Intensive care unit and total hospital length of stay were prolonged at 6.2 and 14.7 days, respectively. Late follow-up between July 1, 1998, and November 1, 1999, was 98% complete. Actuarial survival at 1 and 5 years was 80% and 55%, respectively. Predictors of late mortality were preoperative or perioperative stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, aortic stenosis, and postoperative renal dysfunction. The mean New York Heart Association functional class for 65 long-term survivors improved from 3.1 to 1.7. Quality of life assessed with the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 was comparable to that predicted for the general population >75 years old.
CONCLUSIONS: Functional outcome after aortic valve replacement in patients >80 years old is excellent, the operative risk is acceptable, and the late survival rate is good. Surgery should not be withheld from the elderly on the basis of age alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11082365     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.102.suppl_3.iii-70

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  26 in total

1.  Validity of standard gamble utilities in patients referred for aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Amjad I Hussain; Andrew M Garratt; Jan Otto Beitnes; Lars Gullestad; Kjell I Pettersen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Society of Thoracic Surgeons Risk Score predicts hospital charges and resource use after aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  George J Arnaoutakis; Timothy J George; Diane E Alejo; Christian A Merlo; William A Baumgartner; Duke E Cameron; Ashish S Shah
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2011-04-17       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Valve surgery in octogenarians: in-hospital and long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Eduardo Bossone; Giuseppe Di Benedetto; Alessandro Frigiola; Giannignazio Luigi Carbone; Antonello Panza; Silvia Cirri; Andrea Ballotta; Stefano Messina; Saverio Rega; Rodolfo Citro; Santi Trimarchi; Jianming Fang; Paolo Righini; Alessandro Distante; Kim A Eagle; Rajendra H Mehta
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 4.  Health-related quality of life after transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: an updated review of literature.

Authors:  Saurav Chatterjee; Dharam Jaydeep Kumbhani; Partha Sardar; Anasua Chakraborty; Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai; Manpreet Singh Sabharwal; Richard Ro; Balaji Pratap; Chirag P Bavishi; Sripal Bangalore
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Changing nature of cardiac interventions in older adults.

Authors:  John A Dodson; Mathew S Maurer
Journal:  Aging health       Date:  2011-04

6.  The effect of aortic valve replacement on quality of life in symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  M W A van Geldorp; H J Heuvelman; A P Kappetein; J J V Busschbach; J J M Takkenberg; A J J C Bogers
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.380

7.  Health Status Benefits of Transcatheter vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis at Intermediate Surgical Risk: Results From the PARTNER 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Suzanne J Baron; Suzanne V Arnold; Kaijun Wang; Elizabeth A Magnuson; Khaja Chinnakondepali; Raj Makkar; Howard C Herrmann; Susheel Kodali; Vinod H Thourani; Samir Kapadia; Lars Svensson; David L Brown; Michael J Mack; Craig R Smith; Martin B Leon; David J Cohen
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 14.676

8.  Quality of life among patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  M W A van Geldorp; H J Heuvelman; A P Kappetein; J J V Busschbach; D J Cohen; J J M Takkenberg; A J J C Bogers
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.380

9.  Revival of an old method with new techniques: balloon aortic valvuloplasty of the calcified aortic stenosis in the elderly.

Authors:  Stefan Sack; Philipp Kahlert; Sasan Khandanpour; Christoph Naber; Sebastian Philipp; Stefan Möhlenkamp; Burkhard Sievers; Hagen Kälsch; Raimund Erbel
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 5.460

10.  Aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis in the elderly: influence of prosthesis-patient mismatch on late survival and left ventricular mass regression.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Kato; Yasushi Tsutsumi; Takahiro Kawai; Tomoyuki Goto; Yosuke Takahashi; Hirokazu Ohashi
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2008-08-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.