Literature DB >> 11081888

Processing scavenged blood with a cell saver reduces cerebral lipid microembolization.

E H Kincaid1, T J Jones, D A Stump, W R Brown, D M Moody, D D Deal, J W Hammon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Microembolization during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) can be detected in the brain as lipid deposits that create small capillary and arteriolar dilations (SCADs) with ischemic injury and neuronal dysfunction. SCAD density is increased with the use of cardiotomy suction to scavenge shed blood. Our purpose was to determine whether various methods of processing shed blood during CPB decrease cerebral lipid microembolic burden.
METHODS: After hypothermic CPB (70 minutes), brain tissue from two groups of mongrel dogs (28 to 35 kg) was examined for the presence of SCADs. In the arterial filter (AF) group (n = 12), shed blood was collected in a cardiotomy suction reservoir and reinfused through the arterial circuit. Three different arterial line filters (Pall LeukoGuard, Pall StatPrime, Bentley Duraflo) were used alone and in various combinations. In the cell saver (CS) group (n = 12), shed blood was collected in a cell saver with intermittent preocessing (Medtronic autoLog model) or a continuous-action cell saver (Fresenius Continuous Auto Transfusion System) and reinfused with and without leukocyte filtration through the CPB circuit.
RESULTS: Mean SCAD density (SCAD/cm2) in the CS group was less than the AF group (11 +/- 3 vs 24 +/- 5, p = 0.02). There were no significant differences in SCAD density with leukocyte filtration or with the various arterial line filters. Mean SCAD density for the continuous-action cell saver was 8 +/- 2 versus 13 +/- 5 for the intermittent-action device.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of a cell saver to scavenge shed blood during CPB decreases cerebral lipid microembolization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11081888     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01588-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  19 in total

Review 1.  Transfusion of post-operative shed blood: laboratory characteristics and clinical utility.

Authors:  M Muñoz; J J García-Vallejo; M D Ruiz; R Romero; E Olalla; C Sebastián
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-05-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Evidence-based used, yet still controversial: the arterial filter.

Authors:  Filip De Somer
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2012-03

Review 3.  Laboratory characteristics and clinical utility of post-operative cell salvage: washed or unwashed blood transfusion?

Authors:  Manuel Muñoz; Robert Slappendel; Dafydd Thomas
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 4.  From trash to leucocytes: what are we filtering and why?

Authors:  Simon J Mitchell
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2006-03

5.  Classic pages of the Journal of Extracorporeal Technology.

Authors:  Jeff Riley
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2006-06

6.  It's not the pump, it's how you use the pump!

Authors:  David A Stump
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2006-06

7.  Cannulae and cell saver design: do they make a difference?

Authors:  David A Stump
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2007-12

Review 8.  Twenty years trying to protect the brain: what do we know?

Authors:  David A Stump
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2007-12

Review 9.  Optimization of the perfusion circuit and its possible impact on the inflammatory response.

Authors:  Filip De Somer
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2007-12

Review 10.  Brain protection during cardiac surgery: circa 2012.

Authors:  John W Hammon
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2013-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.