BACKGROUND: Antiestrogens are effective in the treatment of estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast carcinoma. The use of antiestrogen therapy in pituitary adenomas, however, has not been explored. This study attempted to identify a population who may benefit from antiestrogen therapy. MATERIALS & METHODS: Prolactinomas from 29 patients (10 men, 19 women) were analyzed for ER and Ki-67 labeling index using immunohistochemistry. Nine of the 19 women were either amenorrheic or had not received exogenous estrogen for at least one year. Ten women were menstruating either spontaneously or as a result of estrogen administration. Factors including age, serum prolactin level, tumor size, evidence of tumor invasiveness and recurrence of tumor were evaluated to determine if they were predictive of ER expression. RESULTS: Tumors from 6/10 (60%) men were positive for ER. Among women who were having menses, 9/10 (90%) tumors were positive, whereas 6/9 (67%) tumors from amenorrheic women were positive. Statistical analysis revealed that none of the variables: gender, age, menstrual status, Ki-67 proliferative rate, exposure to dopamine agonists, preoperative prolactin level, tumor size, or invasiveness was predictive for the presence of the receptor. The incidence of ER, however, was significantly reduced in recurrent tumors (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: ER expression is less likely in recurrent tumors. The efficacy of ER antagonists cannot be inferred by gender or estrogen exposure.
BACKGROUND: Antiestrogens are effective in the treatment of estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast carcinoma. The use of antiestrogen therapy in pituitary adenomas, however, has not been explored. This study attempted to identify a population who may benefit from antiestrogen therapy. MATERIALS & METHODS:Prolactinomas from 29 patients (10 men, 19 women) were analyzed for ER and Ki-67 labeling index using immunohistochemistry. Nine of the 19 women were either amenorrheic or had not received exogenous estrogen for at least one year. Ten women were menstruating either spontaneously or as a result of estrogen administration. Factors including age, serum prolactin level, tumor size, evidence of tumor invasiveness and recurrence of tumor were evaluated to determine if they were predictive of ER expression. RESULTS:Tumors from 6/10 (60%) men were positive for ER. Among women who were having menses, 9/10 (90%) tumors were positive, whereas 6/9 (67%) tumors from amenorrheic women were positive. Statistical analysis revealed that none of the variables: gender, age, menstrual status, Ki-67 proliferative rate, exposure to dopamine agonists, preoperative prolactin level, tumor size, or invasiveness was predictive for the presence of the receptor. The incidence of ER, however, was significantly reduced in recurrent tumors (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS:ER expression is less likely in recurrent tumors. The efficacy of ER antagonists cannot be inferred by gender or estrogen exposure.
Authors: C Rose; S M Thorpe; K W Andersen; B V Pedersen; H T Mouridsen; M Blichert-Toft; B B Rasmussen Journal: Lancet Date: 1985-01-05 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Lisa M Neff; Michelle Weil; Alan Cole; Thomas R Hedges; William Shucart; Donald Lawrence; Jay-Jiguang Zhu; Arthur S Tischler; Ronald M Lechan Journal: Pituitary Date: 2007 Impact factor: 4.107