OBJECTIVE: The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) is a valid and widely used instrument for the assessment of osteoarthritis patients. We examined whether applying Rasch analysis, a new item-response theory, supports its metric properties. METHODS: The metric properties were examined in a cohort of patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. In an exploratory approach, a validated German version of the WOMAC was analyzed using Rasch analysis for its unidimensionality and construct definition. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-eight patients were included in the study. The 3 WOMAC domains--pain, stiffness, and physical function--were unidimensional when examined separately. In an analysis including all items, the stiffness items did not fit the model. This indicates that they are distinct from the pain and function items. Item difficulty analyses revealed redundancy between corresponding pain and function items addressing the same task (e.g., "pain while standing upright" and "difficulty while standing"). CONCLUSION: Applying Rasch analysis to the 3 WOMAC domains confirms their unidimensionality. However, the pain and function items seem to represent the same construct. Thus, it may be possible to simplify these domains to avoid redundancy. The impact of reducing items must nevertheless be examined.
OBJECTIVE: The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) is a valid and widely used instrument for the assessment of osteoarthritispatients. We examined whether applying Rasch analysis, a new item-response theory, supports its metric properties. METHODS: The metric properties were examined in a cohort of patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. In an exploratory approach, a validated German version of the WOMAC was analyzed using Rasch analysis for its unidimensionality and construct definition. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-eight patients were included in the study. The 3 WOMAC domains--pain, stiffness, and physical function--were unidimensional when examined separately. In an analysis including all items, the stiffness items did not fit the model. This indicates that they are distinct from the pain and function items. Item difficulty analyses revealed redundancy between corresponding pain and function items addressing the same task (e.g., "pain while standing upright" and "difficulty while standing"). CONCLUSION: Applying Rasch analysis to the 3 WOMAC domains confirms their unidimensionality. However, the pain and function items seem to represent the same construct. Thus, it may be possible to simplify these domains to avoid redundancy. The impact of reducing items must nevertheless be examined.
Authors: T Sean Lynch; Richard D Parker; Ronak M Patel; Jack T Andrish; Kurt P Spindler; Annunziata Amendola; Robert H Brophy; Warren R Dunn; David C Flanigan; Laura J Huston; Morgan H Jones; Christopher C Kaeding; Robert G Marx; Matthew J Matava; Eric C McCarty; Angela D Pedroza; Emily K Reinke; Brian R Wolf; Rick W Wright Journal: J Am Acad Orthop Surg Date: 2015-02-09 Impact factor: 3.020
Authors: Pradeep Suri; David C Morgenroth; C Kent Kwoh; Jonathan F Bean; Leonid Kalichman; David J Hunter Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: L D Roorda; C A Jones; M Waltz; G J Lankhorst; L M Bouter; J W van der Eijken; W J Willems; I C Heyligers; D C Voaklander; K D Kelly; M E Suarez-Almazor Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Amaia Bilbao; José M Quintana; Antonio Escobar; Carlota Las Hayas; Miren Orive Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2011-09-21 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Alan M Jette; Christine M McDonough; Pengsheng Ni; Stephen M Haley; Ronald K Hambleton; Sippy Olarsch; David J Hunter; Young-jo Kim; David T Felson Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2009-07-09 Impact factor: 5.156