Literature DB >> 11080990

The European Biomedical Ethics Practitioner Education Project: an experiential approach to philosophy and ethics in health care education.

D L Dickenson1, M J Parker.   

Abstract

The European Biomedical Ethics Practitioner Education Project (EBEPE), funded by the BIOMED programme of the European Commission, is a five-nation partnership to produce open learning materials for healthcare ethics education. Papers and case studies from a series of twelve conferences throughout the European Union, reflecting the 'burning issues' in the participants' healthcare systems, have been collected by a team based at Imperial College, London, where they are now being edited into a series of seven activity-based workbooks for individual or group study. These draft workbooks are now being read by a network of critical readers across Europe, whose comments will be incorporated into the final versions of the workbooks. The result will be the first European-wide and Europe-centred resource for teaching students, practitioners, and members of ethics committees. Topics covered include: Resource allocation and rationing The rights of children and young people Long-term care of the elderly Mental health and mental illness Autonomy and patient choice Decisions at the end of life A study guide to using the workbooks. The collaborative nature of the project has highlighted differentiated national approaches in medical ethics. Against the British and Dutch rights-orientated approach have emerged two other alternative models: the Nordic preference for administrative resolution of entitlement disputes, and the southern European emphasis on deontological codes. A genuinely European reconstruction of autonomy and rights, using hermeneutic, feminist and narrative approaches to counterbalance individualistic models, is emerging across the workbooks. The programme has also uncovered national differences in how ethics should be taught, with the workbooks' style being an experiential approach. Thus the EBEPE project is developing new models in both substantive and pedagogic senses, about both what should be taught and how it should be presented.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioethics and Professional Ethics

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 11080990     DOI: 10.1023/a:1009997032264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Health Care Philos        ISSN: 1386-7423


  5 in total

1.  Do case studies mislead about the nature of reality?

Authors:  S Pattison; D Dickenson; M Parker; T Heller
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Regulating life and death: the modification and commodification of nature.

Authors:  A Trew
Journal:  Univ Toledo Law Rev       Date:  1998

3.  Values education: a new direction for medical education.

Authors:  R Grundstein-Amado
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  The new Italian code of medical ethics.

Authors:  V Fineschi; E Turillazzi; C Cateni
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Autonomy, problem-based learning, and the teaching of medical ethics.

Authors:  M Parker
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.903

  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  Mental capacity: in search of alternative perspectives.

Authors:  Ron Berghmans; Donna Dickenson; Ruud Ter Meulen
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2004-12

2.  [Instruction in medical ethics during clinical training for medical students: report on experience in radio-oncology].

Authors:  C Schäfer; C Lenk; O Kölbl
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 3.  Motivations for and Challenges in the Development of Global Medical Curricula: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Meredith Giuliani; Maria Athina Tina Martimianakis; Michaela Broadhurst; Janet Papadakos; Rouhi Fazelzad; Erik W Driessen; Janneke Frambach
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 7.840

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.