Literature DB >> 11080600

Women's satisfaction with information at breast biopsy in breast cancer screening.

G Rehnberg1, P Absetz, A R Aro.   

Abstract

Information needs, satisfaction with information and information sources of women referred for surgical biopsy in mammography screening were explored. Forty-five Finnish women (23 benign and 22 malignant finding) replied to a mailed questionnaire containing fixed-choice and open-ended questions 10 weeks after biopsy. Information was regarded an important form of support. In response to fixed-choice questions the women expressed a general satisfaction with the information received at the hospital, but answers to open questions revealed shortcomings in the ways of being informed. The results underscored the active role of the staff in giving information, in matching the information to women's needs and abilities at the time and in encouraging patients to express their concerns. Up to the point of diagnosis the needs of women with benign and malignant finding were similar. Regardless of diagnosis the women should be provided with reassuring information throughout and after the examination period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11080600     DOI: 10.1016/s0738-3991(99)00118-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  8 in total

1.  The EORTC information questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-INFO25. Validation study for Spanish patients.

Authors:  Juan Ignacio Arraras; Ana Manterola; Berta Hernández; Fernando Arias de la Vega; Maite Martínez; Meritxell Vila; Clara Eito; Ruth Vera; Miguel Ángel Domínguez
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Older women's experience with a benign breast biopsy—a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Mara A Schonberg; Rebecca A Silliman; Long H Ngo; Robyn L Birdwell; Valerie Fein-Zachary; Jessica Donato; Edward R Marcantonio
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Satisfaction with information and its association with illness perception and quality of life in Indonesian breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Aulia Iskandarsyah; Cora de Klerk; Dradjat R Suardi; Monty P Soemitro; Sawitri S Sadarjoen; Jan Passchier
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Formal evaluation of PYNK: Breast Cancer Program for Young Women-the patient perspective.

Authors:  L Cohen; J Hamer; C Helwig; K Fergus; A Kiss; R Mandel; B Dawson; A Landsberg; K Shein; N Kay; E Warner
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Improving screening recall services for women with false-positive mammograms: a comparison of qualitative evidence with UK guidelines.

Authors:  Mary Bond; Ruth Garside; Christopher Hyde
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Artificial intelligence in automatic classification of invasive ductal carcinoma breast cancer in digital pathology images.

Authors:  Mohammad Abdolahi; Mohammad Salehi; Iman Shokatian; Reza Reiazi
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2020-10-20

7.  Pilot Testing and Preliminary Psychometric Validation of the Polish Translation of the EORTC INFO25 Questionnaire: Validation of the Polish version of INFO25-pilot study.

Authors:  Mirosława Püsküllüoğlu; Krzysztof A Tomaszewski; Aneta L Zygulska; Sebastian Ochenduszko; Joanna Streb; Iwona M Tomaszewska; Krzysztof Krzemieniecki
Journal:  Appl Res Qual Life       Date:  2013-06-28

8.  Web-based information and support for patients with a newly diagnosed neuroendocrine tumor: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Grietje Bouma; Lotte D de Hosson; Claudia E van Woerkom; Hennie van Essen; Geertruida H de Bock; Jolien M Admiraal; Anna K L Reyners; Annemiek M E Walenkamp
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 3.603

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.