Literature DB >> 11080490

Bipartite geminivirus host adaptation determined cooperatively by coding and noncoding sequences of the genome.

I T Petty1, S C Carter, M R Morra, J L Jeffrey, H E Olivey.   

Abstract

Bipartite geminiviruses are small, plant-infecting viruses with genomes composed of circular, single-stranded DNA molecules, designated A and B. Although they are closely related genetically, individual bipartite geminiviruses frequently exhibit host-specific adaptation. Two such viruses are bean golden mosaic virus (BGMV) and tomato golden mosaic virus (TGMV), which are well adapted to common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) and Nicotiana benthamiana, respectively. In previous studies, partial host adaptation was conferred on BGMV-based or TGMV-based hybrid viruses by separately exchanging open reading frames (ORFs) on DNA A or DNA B. Here we analyzed hybrid viruses in which all of the ORFs on both DNAs were exchanged except for AL1, which encodes a protein with strictly virus-specific activity. These hybrid viruses exhibited partial transfer of host-adapted phenotypes. In contrast, exchange of noncoding regions (NCRs) upstream from the AR1 and BR1 ORFs did not confer any host-specific gain of function on hybrid viruses. However, when the exchangeable ORFs and NCRs from TGMV were combined in a single BGMV-based hybrid virus, complete transfer of TGMV-like adaptation to N. benthamiana was achieved. Interestingly, the reciprocal TGMV-based hybrid virus displayed only partial gain of function in bean. This may be, in part, the result of defective virus-specific interactions between TGMV and BGMV sequences present in the hybrid, although a potential role in adaptation to bean for additional regions of the BGMV genome cannot be ruled out. Copyright 2000 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11080490     DOI: 10.1006/viro.2000.0620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virology        ISSN: 0042-6822            Impact factor:   3.616


  7 in total

1.  Tissue specificity of geminivirus infection is genetically determined.

Authors:  M R Morra; I T Petty
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 11.277

2.  Differential pathogenicity among Tomato leaf curl Gujarat virus isolates from India.

Authors:  Punam Ranjan; R Vinoth Kumar; S Chakraborty
Journal:  Virus Genes       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 2.332

3.  High-frequency reversion of geminivirus replication protein mutants during infection.

Authors:  Gerardo Arguello-Astorga; J Trinidad Ascencio-Ibáñez; Mary Beth Dallas; Beverly M Orozco; Linda Hanley-Bowdoin
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 5.103

4.  Preservation of viral genomes in 700-y-old caribou feces from a subarctic ice patch.

Authors:  Terry Fei Fan Ng; Li-Fang Chen; Yanchen Zhou; Beth Shapiro; Mathias Stiller; Peter D Heintzman; Arvind Varsani; Nikola O Kondov; Walt Wong; Xutao Deng; Thomas D Andrews; Brian J Moorman; Thomas Meulendyk; Glen MacKay; Robert L Gilbertson; Eric Delwart
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Genetic determinants of symptoms on viral DNA satellites.

Authors:  Chenjun Ding; Ling Qing; Zhenghe Li; Yi Liu; Yajuan Qian; Xueping Zhou
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 6.  Tomato Leaf Curl New Delhi Virus: An Emerging Virus Complex Threatening Vegetable and Fiber Crops.

Authors:  Enrique Moriones; Shelly Praveen; Supriya Chakraborty
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 5.048

7.  Determinants of Disease Phenotype Differences Caused by Closely-Related Isolates of Begomovirus Betasatellites Inoculated with the Same Species of Helper Virus.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Mingqing Dang; Qingqing Huang; Yajuan Qian
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 5.048

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.