Literature DB >> 11080466

A national survey of women's views of their maternity care in Scotland.

V Hundley1, A M Rennie, A Fitzmaurice, W Graham, E van Teijlingen, G Penney.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A survey of women's views of their care was undertaken as part of a national audit of maternity services in Scotland. The overall aim of the audit was to determine the extent to which recommendations from recent national policy documents had been adopted in practice.
DESIGN: A cross-sectional study seeking the views of all women giving birth throughout Scotland during a 10-day period in September 1998. PARTICIPANTS: All women giving birth in Scotland within the survey period were eligible to participate in the study. Women unable to complete the questionnaire in English, women for whom the midwife deemed it inappropriate, and women who delivered but no longer resided in Scotland by their 10th postnatal day were excluded. DATA COLLECTION: A self-complete questionnaire given to the woman by her community midwife for completion on her 10th postnatal day. DATA ANALYSIS: Analysis was carried out using the statistical package SPSS for Windows. Descriptive statistics were produced for all variables. Statistical tests of significance were not used, as this was primarily a descriptive survey.
FINDINGS: Of the 1152 questionnaires returned, 1137 were suitable for analysis. This gave a response rate of 69% of the eligible population (1639). Most women (80%) had the majority of their antenatal care in the community but only one third had a choice about this. Sixty-nine per cent of women received care from one or two people. However, only 37% had a choice about who these people were. The majority of women gave birth in hospital (99%). Sixty-one per cent felt that they had a choice about where they could have their baby. However, fewer women had a choice about having a home birth (41%) or a DOMINO delivery (23%). Just over half the women felt that it was important to be cared for by a midwife that they had met during pregnancy but only 12% of women achieved this. Sixty-two per cent of women had talked to a health professional about what happened during labour and delivery but less than half had spoken with a professional who was present during her labour or birth.
CONCLUSIONS: Considerable efforts have been made to improve information and choice for women. However, it is clear that further work is needed if women are to be offered informed choice in the provision of their maternity care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11080466     DOI: 10.1054/midw.2000.0231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  9 in total

1.  Ethnic and social inequalities in women's experience of maternity care in England: results of a national survey.

Authors:  V S Raleigh; D Hussey; I Seccombe; K Hallt
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  A questionnaire to measure women's experiences with pregnancy, birth and postnatal care: instrument development and assessment following a national survey in Norway.

Authors:  Ingeborg S Sjetne; Hilde H Iversen; Johanne G Kjøllesdal
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Are Kazakhstani Women Satisfied with Antenatal Care? Implementing the WHO Tool to Assess the Quality of Antenatal Services.

Authors:  Marzhan A Dauletyarova; Yuliya M Semenova; Galiya Kaylubaeva; Gulshat K Manabaeva; Bakytkul Toktabayeva; Maryash S Zhelpakova; Oxana A Yurkovskaya; Aidos S Tlemissov; Galina Antonova; Andrej M Grjibovski
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Socio-demographic determinants of women's satisfaction with prenatal and delivery care services in Italy.

Authors:  Valentina Tocchioni; Chiara Seghieri; Gustavo De Santis; Sabina Nuti
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 2.038

5.  Expectations and experiences of hospital postnatal care in the UK: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.

Authors:  Reem Malouf; Jane Henderson; Fiona Alderdice
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  WHO standards-based tool to measure women's views on the quality of care around the time of childbirth at facility level in the WHO European region: development and validation in Italy.

Authors:  Marzia Lazzerini; Giorgia Argentini; Ilaria Mariani; Benedetta Covi; Chiara Semenzato; O Lincetto; Moise Muzigaba; Emanuelle Pessa Valente
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Survey of women's experiences of care in a new freestanding midwifery unit in an inner city area of London, England. 1: Methods and women's overall ratings of care.

Authors:  Alison J Macfarlane; Lucia Rocca-Ihenacho; Lyle R Turner; Carolyn Roth
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2014-03-29       Impact factor: 2.372

Review 8.  Immigrant and non-immigrant women's experiences of maternity care: a systematic and comparative review of studies in five countries.

Authors:  Rhonda Small; Carolyn Roth; Manjri Raval; Touran Shafiei; Dineke Korfker; Maureen Heaman; Christine McCourt; Anita Gagnon
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Reducing the length of postnatal hospital stay: implications for cost and quality of care.

Authors:  John Bowers; Helen Cheyne
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 2.655

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.