Literature DB >> 11079991

What is the next step in patient decision support?

G C Scott1, L A Lenert.   

Abstract

Patient decision support systems have a promising role in the delivery of health care. However, the best approach for further development of these systems is a matter of speculation. To help chart a course for further development of decision support systems, we consider the four traditional roles that patients play in the medical decision making process, the limitations that patients face in participating in each role and describe how contemporary systems address can facilitate successful decision making for each role. Because patients have a diversity of preferences for the role they play in decision making, we believe that the critical research question is how to make decision support systems robust enough to support a patient's desired role, whatever that role might be. By directing research in decision support systems in this fashion, we believe that they will achieve a larger patient audience and have increased value in the delivery of clinical care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11079991      PMCID: PMC2243960     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp        ISSN: 1531-605X


  16 in total

Review 1.  Four models of the physician-patient relationship.

Authors:  E J Emanuel; L L Emanuel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992 Apr 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.

Authors:  A Tversky; D Kahneman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-09-27       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Quality-of-life research on the Internet: feasibility and potential biases in patients with ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  R M Soetikno; R Mrad; V Pao; L A Lenert
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies.

Authors:  B J McNeil; S G Pauker; H C Sox; A Tversky
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-05-27       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Use of meta-analytic results to facilitate shared decision making.

Authors:  L A Lenert; D J Cher
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Automated computer interviews to elicit utilities: potential applications in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis.

Authors:  L A Lenert; R M Soetikno
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  SecondOpinion: interactive Web-based access to a decision model.

Authors:  G C Scott; D J Cher; L A Lenert
Journal:  Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp       Date:  1997

Review 8.  Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review.

Authors:  A M O'Connor; A Rostom; V Fiset; J Tetroe; V Entwistle; H Llewellyn-Thomas; M Holmes-Rovner; M Barry; J Jones
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-18

Review 9.  Patients' preferences for participation in clinical decision making: a review of published surveys.

Authors:  J Benbassat; D Pilpel; M Tidhar
Journal:  Behav Med       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.104

10.  Watchful waiting vs immediate transurethral resection for symptomatic prostatism. The importance of patients' preferences.

Authors:  M J Barry; A G Mulley; F J Fowler; J W Wennberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-05-27       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  2 in total

1.  Implementing security and access control mechanisms for an electronic healthcare record.

Authors:  Frank K Ueckert; Hans-Ulrich Prokosch
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2002

2.  Towards Supporting Patient Decision-making In Online Diabetes Communities.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Rebecca Marmor; Jina Huh
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-04-16
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.