Literature DB >> 11079854

A Bayesian network for mammography.

E Burnside1, D Rubin, R Shachter.   

Abstract

The interpretation of a mammogram and decisions based on it involve reasoning and management of uncertainty. The wide variation of training and practice among radiologists results in significant variability in screening performance with attendant cost and efficacy consequences. We have created a Bayesian belief network to integrate the findings on a mammogram, based on the standardized lexicon developed for mammography, the Breast Imaging Reporting And Data System (BI-RADS). Our goal in creating this network is to explore the probabilistic underpinnings of this lexicon as well as standardize mammographic decision-making to the level of expert knowledge.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11079854      PMCID: PMC2243709     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp        ISSN: 1531-605X


  6 in total

1.  Improvement of radiologists' characterization of mammographic masses by using computer-aided diagnosis: an ROC study.

Authors:  H P Chan; B Sahiner; M A Helvie; N Petrick; M A Roubidoux; T E Wilson; D D Adler; C Paramagul; J S Newman; S Sanjay-Gopal
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Pathology of benign and malignant breast disorders.

Authors:  C W Sewell
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 3.  Management of probably benign breast lesions.

Authors:  E A Sickles
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.303

4.  Screening mammography in community practice: positive predictive value of abnormal findings and yield of follow-up diagnostic procedures.

Authors:  M L Brown; F Houn; E A Sickles; L G Kessler
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists. Findings from a national sample.

Authors:  C A Beam; P M Layde; D C Sullivan
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1996-01-22

6.  Breast cancer: prediction with artificial neural network based on BI-RADS standardized lexicon.

Authors:  J A Baker; P J Kornguth; J Y Lo; M E Williford; C E Floyd
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 11.105

  6 in total
  14 in total

1.  A Bayesian network for diagnosis of primary bone tumors.

Authors:  C E Kahn; J J Laur; G F Carrera
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Developing a utility decision framework to evaluate predictive models in breast cancer risk estimation.

Authors:  Yirong Wu; Craig K Abbey; Xianqiao Chen; Jie Liu; David C Page; Oguzhan Alagoz; Peggy Peissig; Adedayo A Onitilo; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-08-17

3.  A Bayesian classifier for differentiating benign versus malignant thyroid nodules using sonographic features.

Authors:  Yueyi I Liu; Aya Kamaya; Terry S Desser; Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2008-11-06

4.  A Probabilistic Model to Support Radiologists' Classification Decisions in Mammography Practice.

Authors:  Jiaming Zeng; Francisco Gimenez; Elizabeth S Burnside; Daniel L Rubin; Ross Shachter
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  A novel method to assess incompleteness of mammography reports.

Authors:  Francisco J Gimenez; Yirong Wu; Elizabeth S Burnside; Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2014-11-14

6.  Developing a clinical utility framework to evaluate prediction models in radiogenomics.

Authors:  Yirong Wu; Jie Liu; Alejandro Munoz Del Rio; David C Page; Oguzhan Alagoz; Peggy Peissig; Adedayo A Onitilo; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2015-03-17

7.  Screening in the dark: ethical considerations of providing screening tests to individuals when evidence is insufficient to support screening populations.

Authors:  Ingrid M Burger; Nancy E Kass
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 11.229

8.  A comparison of methods for assessing penetrating trauma on retrospective multi-center data.

Authors:  Bilal A Ahmed; Michael E Matheny; Phillip L Rice; John R Clarke; Omolola I Ogunyemi
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 6.317

9.  Probabilistic computer model developed from clinical data in national mammography database format to classify mammographic findings.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Burnside; Jesse Davis; Jagpreet Chhatwal; Oguzhan Alagoz; Mary J Lindstrom; Berta M Geller; Benjamin Littenberg; Katherine A Shaffer; Charles E Kahn; C David Page
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Using automatically extracted information from mammography reports for decision-support.

Authors:  Selen Bozkurt; Francisco Gimenez; Elizabeth S Burnside; Kemal H Gulkesen; Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 6.317

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.