Literature DB >> 11079654

Troglitazone reduces neointimal tissue proliferation after coronary stent implantation in patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus: a serial intravascular ultrasound study.

T Takagi1, T Akasaka, A Yamamuro, Y Honda, T Hozumi, S Morioka, K Yoshida.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to determine whether troglitazone reduces neointimal tissue proliferation after coronary stent implantation in patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM).
BACKGROUND: Increased in-stent restenosis in patients with diabetes mellitus is due to accelerated neointimal tissue proliferation after coronary stent implantation. Troglitazone inhibits intimal hyperplasia in experimental animal models.
METHODS: We studied 62 stented lesions in 52 patients with plasma glucose levels (PG) > or = 11.1 mmol/liter at 2 h after 75 g oral glucose load. The study patients were randomized into two groups: the troglitazone group of 25 patients with 29 stents, who were treated with 400 mg of troglitazone, and the control group of 27 patients with 33 stents. All patients underwent oral glucose tolerance tests before and after their six-month treatment period. The sum of PG (sum of PG) and the sum of insulin levels (sum of IRI) were measured. Serial (postintervention and at six-month follow-up) intravascular ultrasound studies were performed. Cross-sectional images within stents were taken at every 1 mm, using an automatic pullback. Stent areas (SA), lumen areas (LA), and intimal areas (IA = SA - LA) were measured and averaged over a number of selected image slices. The intimal index was calculated as intimal index = averaged IA/averaged SA x 100%.
RESULTS: There were no differences between the two groups before treatment in sum of PG (31.35 +/- 3.07 mmol/liter vs. 32.89 +/- 4.87 mmol/liter, respectively, p = 0.2998) and sum of IRI (219.6 +/- 106.2 mU/liter vs. 209.2 +/- 91.6 mU/liter, respectively, p = 0.8934). However, reductions in sum of PG at the six-month follow-up in the troglitazone group were significantly greater than those in the control group (-21.4 +/- 8.8% vs. -4.5 +/- 7.4%, respectively, p < 0.0001). Likewise, decreases in sum of IRI were greater in the troglitazone-treated group (-31.4 +/- 17.9% vs. -1.9 +/- 15.1%, respectively, p < 0.0001). Although, there were no differences between the two groups in SA at postintervention (7.4 +/- 2.2 mm2 vs. 7.3 +/- 1.7 mm2, respectively, p = 0.9482) and at follow-up (7.3 +/- 2.3 mm2 vs. 7.3 +/- 1.8 mm2, respectively, p = 0.2307), the LA at follow-up in the troglitazone group was significantly greater than that in the control group (5.3 +/- 1.7 mm2 vs. 3.7 +/- 1.7 mm2, respectively, p = 0.0002). The IA at follow-up in the troglitazone group was significantly smaller than that in the control group (2.0 +/- 0.9 mm2 vs. 3.5 +/- 1.8 mm2, respectively, p < 0.0001). This was also true for intimal index (27.1 +/- 11.5% vs. 49.0 +/- 14.4%, respectively, p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Serial intravascular ultrasound assessment shows that administration of troglitazone reduces neointimal tissue proliferation after coronary stent implantation in patients with NIDDM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11079654     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00895-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  31 in total

Review 1.  Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma: a potential therapeutic target in the management of ischaemic heart disease.

Authors:  J S Sidhu; J C Kaski
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma gene polymorphisms and restenosis in diabetic patients after stenting in coronary arteries.

Authors:  W Koch; V Jung; N von Beckerath; A Schömig; A Kastrati
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2004-05-20       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 3.  Percutaneous coronary intervention in diabetics.

Authors:  Juhana Karha; Deepak L Bhatt
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 4.  In stent restenosis: bane of the stent era.

Authors:  A K Mitra; D K Agrawal
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  The CARDia trial protocol.

Authors:  D Smith
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 6.  Coronary artery disease and diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Doron Aronson; Elazer R Edelman
Journal:  Cardiol Clin       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 2.213

Review 7.  Drugs for cardiovascular risk reduction in the diabetic patient.

Authors:  D S Bell
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 8.  [Care of patients after coronary stent implantation: what is important in practice?].

Authors:  V Schächinger
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 9.  Therapeutic potential of oral antiproliferative agents in the prevention of coronary restenosis.

Authors:  Pramod Kuchulakanti; Ron Waksman
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors alpha and gamma1 inhibits human smooth muscle cell proliferation.

Authors:  Peter Zahradka; Natalia Yurkova; Brenda Litchie; Michael C Moon; Dario F Del Rizzo; Carla G Taylor
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.396

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.