UNLABELLED: It remains a matter of controversy as to whether cerebral perfusion declines with healthy aging. In vivo imaging with PET permits quantitative evaluation of brain physiology; however, previous PET studies have inconsistently reported aging reductions in cerebral blood flow (CBF), oxygen metabolism, and glucose metabolism. In part, this may be because of a lack of correction for the dilution effect of age-related cerebral volume loss on PET measurements. METHODS: CBF PET scans were obtained using [15O]H2O in 27 healthy individuals (age range, 19-76 y) and corrected for partial-volume effects from cerebral atrophy using an MR-based algorithm. RESULTS: There was a significant difference (P = 0.01) in mean cortical CBF between young/midlife (age range, 19-46 y; mean +/- SD, 56+/-10 mL/100 mL/min) and elderly (age range, 60-76 y; mean +/- SD, 49+/-2.6 mL/100 mL/min) subgroups before correcting for partial-volume effects. However, this group difference resolved after partial-volume correction (young/midlife: mean +/- SD, 62+/-10 mL/100 mL/min; elderly: mean +/- SD, 61+/-4.8 mL/100 mL/min; P = 0.66). When all subjects were considered, a mild but significant inverse correlation between age and cortical CBF measurements was present in the uncorrected but not the corrected data. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that CBF may not decline with age in healthy individuals and that failure to correct for the dilution effect of age-related cerebral atrophy may confound interpretation of previous PET studies that have shown aging reductions in physiologic measurements.
UNLABELLED: It remains a matter of controversy as to whether cerebral perfusion declines with healthy aging. In vivo imaging with PET permits quantitative evaluation of brain physiology; however, previous PET studies have inconsistently reported aging reductions in cerebral blood flow (CBF), oxygen metabolism, and glucose metabolism. In part, this may be because of a lack of correction for the dilution effect of age-related cerebral volume loss on PET measurements. METHODS: CBF PET scans were obtained using [15O]H2O in 27 healthy individuals (age range, 19-76 y) and corrected for partial-volume effects from cerebral atrophy using an MR-based algorithm. RESULTS: There was a significant difference (P = 0.01) in mean cortical CBF between young/midlife (age range, 19-46 y; mean +/- SD, 56+/-10 mL/100 mL/min) and elderly (age range, 60-76 y; mean +/- SD, 49+/-2.6 mL/100 mL/min) subgroups before correcting for partial-volume effects. However, this group difference resolved after partial-volume correction (young/midlife: mean +/- SD, 62+/-10 mL/100 mL/min; elderly: mean +/- SD, 61+/-4.8 mL/100 mL/min; P = 0.66). When all subjects were considered, a mild but significant inverse correlation between age and cortical CBF measurements was present in the uncorrected but not the corrected data. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that CBF may not decline with age in healthy individuals and that failure to correct for the dilution effect of age-related cerebral atrophy may confound interpretation of previous PET studies that have shown aging reductions in physiologic measurements.
Authors: P K Curiati; J H Tamashiro-Duran; F L S Duran; C A Buchpiguel; P Squarzoni; D C Romano; H Vallada; P R Menezes; M Scazufca; G F Busatto; T C T F Alves Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2011-01-27 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Joel Aanerud; Per Borghammer; M Mallar Chakravarty; Kim Vang; Anders B Rodell; Kristjana Y Jónsdottir; Arne Møller; Mahmoud Ashkanian; Manouchehr S Vafaee; Peter Iversen; Peter Johannsen; Albert Gjedde Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2012-02-29 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Bedda L Rosario; Lisa A Weissfeld; Charles M Laymon; Chester A Mathis; William E Klunk; Michael D Berginc; Jeffrey A James; Jessica A Hoge; Julie C Price Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2010-12-31 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Ramon Casanova; Ryali Srikanth; Aaron Baer; Paul J Laurienti; Jonathan H Burdette; Satoru Hayasaka; Lynn Flowers; Frank Wood; Joseph A Maldjian Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2006-10-27 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Giampiero Giovacchini; Robert Bonwetsch; Peter Herscovitch; Richard E Carson; William H Theodore Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2007-09-01 Impact factor: 9.236