Literature DB >> 11079385

Detection and processing of electromagnetic and near-field acoustic signals in elasmobranch fishes.

A D Kalmijn1.   

Abstract

The acoustic near field of quietly moving underwater objects and the bio-electric field of aquatic animals exhibit great similarity, as both are predominantly governed by Laplace's equation. The acoustic and electrical sensory modalities thus may, in directing fishes to their prey, employ analogous processing algorithms, suggesting a common evolutionary design, founded on the salient physical features shared by the respective stimulus fields. Sharks and rays are capable of orientating to the earth's magnetic field and, hence, have a magnetic sense. The electromagnetic theory of orientation offers strong arguments for the animals using the electric fields induced by ocean currents and by their own motions in the earth's magnetic field. In the animal's frame of reference, in which the sense organs are at rest, the classical concept of motional electricity must be interpreted in relativistic terms. In the ampullae of Lorenzini, weak electric fields cause the ciliated apical receptor-cell membranes to produce graded, negative receptor currents opposite in direction to the fields applied. The observed currents form part of a positive-feedback mechanism, supporting the generation of receptor potentials much larger than the input signal. Acting across the basal cell membranes, the receptor potentials control the process of synaptic transmission.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11079385      PMCID: PMC1692843          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2000.0654

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  3 in total

Review 1.  Electric and near-field acoustic detection, a comparative study.

Authors:  A J Kalmijn
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand Suppl       Date:  1997

2.  Electric and magnetic field detection in elasmobranch fishes.

Authors:  A J Kalmijn
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-11-26       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The electric sense of sharks and rays.

Authors:  A J Kalmijn
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1971-10       Impact factor: 3.312

  3 in total
  5 in total

1.  Simple neural networks for the amplification and utilization of small changes in neuron firing rates.

Authors:  R K Adair
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-06-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Detection without deflection? A hypothesis for direct sensing of sound pressure by hair cells.

Authors:  Andrew Bell
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Cardioprotection from stress conditions by weak magnetic fields in the Schumann Resonance band.

Authors:  G Elhalel; C Price; D Fixler; A Shainberg
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Insight into shark magnetic field perception from empirical observations.

Authors:  James M Anderson; Tamrynn M Clegg; Luisa V M V Q Véras; Kim N Holland
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Large-Scale Convergence of Receptor Cell Arrays Onto Afferent Terminal Arbors in the Lorenzinian Electroreceptors of Polyodon.

Authors:  David F Russell; Thomas C Warnock; Wenjuan Zhang; Desmon E Rogers; Lilia L Neiman
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 3.856

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.