Literature DB >> 11079381

The overlapping roles of the inner ear and lateral line: the active space of dipole source detection.

C B Braun1, S Coombs.   

Abstract

The problems associated with the detection of sounds and other mechanical disturbances in the aquatic environment differ greatly from those associated with airborne sounds. The differences are primarily due to the incompressibility of water and the corresponding increase in importance of the acoustic near field. The near field, or hydrodynamic field, is characterized by steep spatial gradients in pressure, and detection of the accelerations associated with these gradients is performed by both the inner ear and the lateral line systems of fishes. Acceleration-sensitive otolithic organs are present in all fishes and provide these animals with a form of inertial audition. The detection of pressure gradients, by both the lateral line and inner ear, is the taxonomically most widespread mechanism of sound-source detection amongst vertebrates, and is thus the most likely primitive mode of detecting sound sources. Surprisingly, little is known about the capabilities of either the lateral line or the otolithic endorgan in the detection of vibratory dipole sources. Theoretical considerations for the overlapping roles of the inner ear and lateral line systems in midwater predict that the lateral line will operate over a shorter distance range than the inner ear, although with a much greater spatial resolution. Our empirical results of dipole detection by mottled sculpin, a benthic fish, do not agree with theoretical predictions based on midwater fishes, in that the distance ranges of the two systems appear to be approximately equal. This is almost certainly as a result of physical coupling between the fishes and the substrate. Thus, rather than having a greater active range, the inner ear appears to have a reduced distance range in benthic fishes, and the lateral line distance range may be concomitantly extended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11079381      PMCID: PMC1692825          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2000.0650

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  4 in total

1.  The functioning and significance of the lateral-line organs.

Authors:  S DIJKGRAAF
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  1963-02

2.  Mechanical factors in the excitation of clupeid lateral lines.

Authors:  E J Denton; J Gray
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1983-04-22

3.  The goldfish ear codes the axis of acoustic particle motion in three dimensions.

Authors:  R R Fay
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-08-31       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Anatomy and differential growth of the lateral line system of the mottled sculpin, Cottus bairdi (Scorpaeniformes: Cottidae).

Authors:  J Janssen; S Coombs; D Hoekstra; C Platt
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.808

  4 in total
  9 in total

1.  Role of the lateral line mechanosensory system in directionality of goldfish auditory evoked escape response.

Authors:  Mana Mirjany; Thomas Preuss; Donald S Faber
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 2.  Building the posterior lateral line system in zebrafish.

Authors:  Ajay B Chitnis; Damian Dalle Nogare; Miho Matsuda
Journal:  Dev Neurobiol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.964

3.  Dipole source encoding and tracking by the goldfish auditory system.

Authors:  Sheryl Coombs; Richard R Fay; Andreas Elepfandt
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Lateral line stimulation patterns and prey orienting behavior in the Lake Michigan mottled sculpin (Cottus bairdi).

Authors:  Sheryl Coombs; Paul Patton
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-01-10       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Goldfish and oscars have comparable responsiveness to dipole stimuli.

Authors:  Ines Eva Nauroth; Joachim Mogdans
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2009-08-05

Review 6.  Incidental sounds of locomotion in animal cognition.

Authors:  Matz Larsson
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  Response of seaward-migrating European eel (Anguilla anguilla) to manipulated flow fields.

Authors:  Adam T Piper; Costantino Manes; Fabio Siniscalchi; Andrea Marion; Rosalind M Wright; Paul S Kemp
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Positive taxis and sustained responsiveness to water motions in larval zebrafish.

Authors:  Antonia H Groneberg; Ulrich Herget; Soojin Ryu; Rodrigo J De Marco
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 3.492

9.  Development of the acoustically evoked behavioral response in larval plainfin midshipman fish, Porichthys notatus.

Authors:  Peter W Alderks; Joseph A Sisneros
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.