Literature DB >> 11079159

First experiences in screening women at high risk for breast cancer with MR imaging.

M M Tilanus-Linthorst1, I M Obdeijn, K C Bartels, H J de Koning, M Oudkerk.   

Abstract

Women with a genetic predisposition for breast cancer are often advised surveillance with physical examination twice a year and mammography once a year from 25 years onwards. However, the sensitivity of the mammography decreases when breast tissue is dense and this is seen in 40-50% of women under 50 years. We therefore investigated whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in addition to the normal surveillance could detect cancers otherwise missed. In 109 women with over 25% risk of breast cancer, MRI was performed because over 50% dense breast tissue was seen at mammography and no suspect lesion was seen at the previous screening. MRI detected breast cancers in three patients (2.8%) occult at mammography and with no new palpable tumor, twice at stage T1bN0 and T1cN0 once. Two cancers were expected. MRI was false positive in six women, resulting in two benign local excisions because ultrasound or fine needle examination confirmed suspicion. We had no false negative MRI results. MRI proved true benign in four BRCA 1/2 gene mutation carriers at histologic examination. Preoperative wire localization of the malignancies detected at MRI proved necessary as the tumor was not palpable in the lumpectomy specimen nor visible at specimen radiology. The extra cost of breast MRI in addition to mammography and physical examination was [symbol: see text]uro13.930 per detected cancer. The cost of the detection of one breast cancer patient in our national screening program is [symbol: see text]uro9000. During follow-up of patients with a familial risk in whom the first breast cancer was detected at MRI, MRI detected two recurrent cancers in stage T1bN0 and T1cN0 and one contralateral cancer T1aNo. Breast MRI is promising in screening young women at high risk for breast cancer, as it can advance the detection of cancers still occult at mammography and physical examination; but the cost may be considerable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11079159     DOI: 10.1023/a:1006480106487

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  36 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of breast MR imaging and screen-film mammography for screening BRCA1 gene mutation carriers.

Authors:  Janie M Lee; Pamela M McMahon; Chung Y Kong; Daniel B Kopans; Paula D Ryan; Elissa M Ozanne; Elkan F Halpern; G Scott Gazelle
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Incorporating new imaging models in breast cancer management.

Authors:  Denise H Reddy; Ellen B Mendelson
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2005-03

3.  What is the sensitivity of mammography and dynamic MR imaging for DCIS if the whole-breast histopathology is used as a reference standard?

Authors:  F Sardanelli; L Bacigalupo; L Carbonaro; A Esseridou; G M Giuseppetti; P Panizza; V Lattanzio; A Del Maschio
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Imaging studies for the early detection of breast cancer.

Authors:  Sylvia H Heywang-Köbrunner; Ingrid Schreer; Walter Heindel; Alexander Katalinic
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-08-04       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 5.  Breast cancer imaging: a perspective for the next decade.

Authors:  Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 6.  State of the art of current modalities for the diagnosis of breast lesions.

Authors:  Cosimo Di Maggio
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 7.  Screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Katrina Armstrong; Constance D Lehman; Suzanne W Fletcher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  [Value of breast MRI as supplement to mammography and sonography for high risk breast cancer patients].

Authors:  T Schlossbauer; K Hellerhoff; M Reiser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 0.635

9.  Multimodality screening of high-risk women: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Susan P Weinstein; A Russell Localio; Emily F Conant; Mark Rosen; Kathleen M Thomas; Mitchell D Schnall
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Breast cancer detection using automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographically dense breasts.

Authors:  Kevin M Kelly; Judy Dean; W Scott Comulada; Sung-Jae Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.