Literature DB >> 11078306

Usefulness of left atrial abnormality for predicting left ventricular hypertrophy in the presence of left bundle branch block.

A Mehta1, A C Jain, M C Mehta, M Billie.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to identify left atrial (LA) abnormality on the electrocardiogram and other related variables as predictors of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy in the presence of left bundle branch block (LBBB). In the presence of complete LBBB, the diagnosis of electrocardiographic abnormalities is problematic and that of LV hypertrophy remains difficult. The usual electrocardiographic criteria applied for the diagnosis of LV hypertrophy may not be reliable in the presence of LBBB. Therefore, noninvasive criteria will help physicians diagnose LV hypertrophy with electrocardiography. LA abnormality on the electrocardiogram was assessed by 2 independent observers as predictor of LV hypertrophy in the presence of LBBB in 120 patients, and data were compared with those of 100 patients without LA abnormality. LV mass was calculated from echocardiographic data. Besides LA abnormality, the other variables studied for prediction of LV hypertrophy were gender, age, body surface area, body mass index, frontal axis, and QrS duration. Of the 6 criteria analyzed, the P terminal force was found to be the most common and consistent criterion to detect LA abnormality. LV hypertrophy was confirmed by echocardiographic determination of LV mass in both groups. Observers reliably differentiated between the hypertrophied and normal-sized left ventricle in the presence of LBBB by correlating LA abnormality with LV mass determined by echocardiography. Observer 1 detected LA abnormality in 89% and observer 2 in 84% of patients. False-positive results were present in 11% and 16%. The observer's recognition of LA abnormality in the present study was 91%. The 2 observers showed a sensitivity of 81% and 79% and a specificity of 91% and 88%, respectively, when diagnosis of LV hypertrophy was determined. LV mass increased significantly and was diagnostic of LV hypertrophy in 92% of patients with LA abnormality. In the remaining 11 patients (8%), the LA abnormality was of marginal abnormal magnitude. Each 0.01-mV/s increase in LA abnormality gave an increase of 30 g of LV mass. LV mass was increased in 86% of patients when corrected by body surface area. LV hypertrophy in the presence of LBBB on electrocardiography was found in only 13 patients (10%) when the 6 frequently used conventional criteria for diagnosis of LV hypertrophy by electrocardiography were used. Regression analysis revealed LA abnormality to be a strong independent predictor of increased LV mass. Multivariate analysis also revealed age, body mass index, body surface area, frontal axis, and QrS duration to be significant predictors of LV mass. This noninvasive study correlates LA abnormality by electrocardiogram and LV hypertrophy with echocardiography to conclude that LA abnormality was significantly diagnostic of LV hypertrophy in the presence of LBBB. Age, body mass index, body surface area, frontal axis, and QrS duration were also significant predictors of LV mass.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11078306     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00746-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  8 in total

Review 1.  [Cardiovascular end organ impairment due to hypertension].

Authors:  C M Schannwell; S Steiner; M G Hennersdorf; B E Strauer
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 0.743

2.  [Hypertension and heart].

Authors:  M Hennersdorf; C M Schannwell; W Motz
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 3.  [The heart in hypertension].

Authors:  M G Hennersdorf; B E Strauer
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 0.743

4.  Impact of Left Bundle Branch Block on Left Atrial Dyssynchrony and Its Relationship to Left Ventricular Diastolic Function in Patients with Heart Failure and Dilated Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Seong-Mi Park; Hee-Dong Kim; Dong-Hyuk Cho; Mi-Na Kim; Wan-Joo Shim
Journal:  Int J Heart Fail       Date:  2019-10-15

5.  Ethnic distribution of ECG predictors of atrial fibrillation and its impact on understanding the ethnic distribution of ischemic stroke in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study.

Authors:  Elsayed Z Soliman; Ronald J Prineas; L Douglas Case; Zhu-ming Zhang; David C Goff
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Fine particulate air pollution is associated with higher vulnerability to atrial fibrillation--the APACR study.

Authors:  Duanping Liao; Michele L Shaffer; Fan He; Sol Rodriguez-Colon; Rongling Wu; Eric A Whitsel; Edward O Bixler; Wayne E Cascio
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2011

Review 7.  Left bundle branch block: Epidemiology, etiology, anatomic features, electrovectorcardiography, and classification proposal.

Authors:  Andrés R Pérez-Riera; Raimundo Barbosa-Barros; Marianne P C de Rezende Barbosa; Rodrigo Daminello-Raimundo; Luiz C de Abreu; Kjell Nikus
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 1.468

8.  Heart ventricular activation in VAT difference maps from children with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Krystyna Laszki-Szcząchor; Dorota Polak-Jonkisz; Danuta Zwolińska; Lesław Rusiecki; Anna Janocha; Małgorzata Sobieszczańska
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.714

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.