OBJECTIVE: To determine to what extent patients with vestibular hypofunction experience falls. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. SETTING: Outpatient tertiary care facility in a university. PATIENTS: Patients with unilateral (n = 70) and bilateral (n = 45) vestibular hypofunction, confirmed on vestibular function testing, aged 24 to 89 years. INTERVENTION: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Incidence of falls. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the incidence of falls reported since the onset of the vestibular deficit by patients with unilateral (UVL) and bilateral (BVL) vestibular hypofunction. The incidence of falls for BVL was significantly greater than that for UVL. The incidence of falls for UVL was not different from that expected in a community-based population when age was considered. The incidence of falls for BVL was significantly greater than that reported for the general population aged 65 through 74 years (51.1% for BVL, 25% for community-dwelling individuals) but was significantly less than expected for persons aged > or =75 years (18.2% for BVL, 49% for community-dwelling individuals). The lower incidence of falls in patients with BVL aged > or =75 years may be related to the use of assistive devices and to a decrease in risky behavior. All patients with serious injury were from the UVL group, and all were >65 years old. The incidence of fall-related injuries requiring medical attention among patients with UVL was similar to that in community-dwelling individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Falls are an important consequence of bilateral vestibular hypofunction, and patients should be counseled about the increased risk of falling. Assistive devices should be considered, especially for persons aged >65 years with BVL.
OBJECTIVE: To determine to what extent patients with vestibular hypofunction experience falls. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. SETTING:Outpatient tertiary care facility in a university. PATIENTS: Patients with unilateral (n = 70) and bilateral (n = 45) vestibular hypofunction, confirmed on vestibular function testing, aged 24 to 89 years. INTERVENTION: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Incidence of falls. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the incidence of falls reported since the onset of the vestibular deficit by patients with unilateral (UVL) and bilateral (BVL) vestibular hypofunction. The incidence of falls for BVL was significantly greater than that for UVL. The incidence of falls for UVL was not different from that expected in a community-based population when age was considered. The incidence of falls for BVL was significantly greater than that reported for the general population aged 65 through 74 years (51.1% for BVL, 25% for community-dwelling individuals) but was significantly less than expected for persons aged > or =75 years (18.2% for BVL, 49% for community-dwelling individuals). The lower incidence of falls in patients with BVL aged > or =75 years may be related to the use of assistive devices and to a decrease in risky behavior. All patients with serious injury were from the UVL group, and all were >65 years old. The incidence of fall-related injuries requiring medical attention among patients with UVL was similar to that in community-dwelling individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Falls are an important consequence of bilateral vestibular hypofunction, and patients should be counseled about the increased risk of falling. Assistive devices should be considered, especially for persons aged >65 years with BVL.
Authors: Tian Bao; Brooke N Klatt; Susan L Whitney; Kathleen H Sienko; Jenna Wiens Journal: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng Date: 2019-01-04 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Courtney D Hall; Susan J Herdman; Susan L Whitney; Stephen P Cass; Richard A Clendaniel; Terry D Fife; Joseph M Furman; Thomas S D Getchius; Joel A Goebel; Neil T Shepard; Sheelah N Woodhouse Journal: J Neurol Phys Ther Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 3.649
Authors: Maria Geraldine Zuniga; Roni E Dinkes; Marcela Davalos-Bichara; John P Carey; Michael C Schubert; W Michael King; Jeremy Walston; Yuri Agrawal Journal: Otol Neurotol Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 2.311