Literature DB >> 11077317

Randomized prospective trial of pylorus-preserving vs. Classic duodenopancreatectomy (Whipple procedure): initial clinical results.

C A Seiler1, M Wagner, C Sadowski, C Kulli, M W Büchler.   

Abstract

During the past decades, the classic Whipple resection (cWhipple) and the pylorus-preserving Whipple (ppWhipple) operation have been advanced for the resection of cancer of the pancreatic head. However, no definitive answer exists as to whether the more conservative ppWhipple operation indeed equalizes the short- and long-term results of the cWhipple procedure. Therefore we conducted a randomized prospective trial in a nonselected series of consecutive patients. Demographics, diagnostic, intraoperative, and histologic findings (tumor type and tumor stage of these patients) as well as postoperative mortality, morbidity, and follow-up after discharge were analyzed. For statistical evaluation Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square tests were used where appropriate. Survival was analyzed according to Kaplan-Meier curves, and differences were examined using the log-rank test. From June 1996 to April 1999, a total of 114 patients with suspected pancreatic or periampullary tumors were prospectively randomized to undergo either a cWhipple or a ppWhipple (intention to treat) operation. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 77 of these patients were included in the final analysis. Forty had a cWhipple and 37 had a ppWhipple resection. There were no differences with regard to age, sex distribution, ASA classification, histologic classification, UICC stage, length of stay in the intensive care unit, and length of hospital stay. The ppWhipple group had a significantly shorter operative time, reduced blood loss, and fewer blood transfusions. There was no difference in mortality, but the cWhipple group showed a significantly higher total morbidity. The incidence of delayed gastric emptying was identical in both groups. For long-term follow-up, a total of 61 patients with histologically proven pancreatic or periampullary carcinoma were analyzed. There were no differences in tumor recurrence or in long-term survival at a median follow-up of 1.1 years (range 0.1 to 2.9 years). Our initial results demonstrate that the cWhipple and ppWhipple operation are equally radical. However, ppWhipple may be the procedure of choice for the treatment of pancreatic and periampullary cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11077317     DOI: 10.1016/s1091-255x(00)80084-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  34 in total

1.  Surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer. The United States experience.

Authors:  E H Livingston; M L Welton; H A Reber
Journal:  Int J Pancreatol       Date:  1991

Review 2.  Pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  A L Warshaw; C Fernández-del Castillo
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-02-13       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  [Value of pylorus preserving partial duodenopancreatectomy in ductal pancreatic carcinoma].

Authors:  M H Schoenberg; F Gansauge; R Kunz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  [The Whipple technique of duodenopancreatectomy].

Authors:  M Trede
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Pyloric and gastric preserving pancreatic resection. Experience with 87 patients.

Authors:  J W Braasch; D J Deziel; R L Rossi; E Watkins; P F Winter
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Decreased morbidity and mortality after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  P A Grace; H A Pitt; R K Tompkins; L DenBesten; W P Longmire
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Survival after resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

Authors:  C Sperti; C Pasquali; A Piccoli; S Pedrazzoli
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Preservation of the pylorus in pancreaticoduodenectomy a follow-up evaluation.

Authors:  L W Traverso; W P Longmire
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Results of extensive surgery for pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  T Nagakawa; M Nagamori; F Futakami; Y Tsukioka; M Kayahara; T Ohta; K Ueno; I Miyazaki
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1996-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 10.  Pancreatoduodenectomy with pyloric preservation for carcinoma of the pancreas: a cautionary note.

Authors:  K W Sharp; C B Ross; S A Halter; J G Morrison; W O Richards; L F Williams; J L Sawyers
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.982

View more
  43 in total

1.  Pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Margaret A Tempero; J Pablo Arnoletti; Stephen Behrman; Edgar Ben-Josef; Al B Benson; Jordan D Berlin; John L Cameron; Ephraim S Casper; Steven J Cohen; Michelle Duff; Joshua D I Ellenhorn; William G Hawkins; John P Hoffman; Boris W Kuvshinoff; Mokenge P Malafa; Peter Muscarella; Eric K Nakakura; Aaron R Sasson; Sarah P Thayer; Douglas S Tyler; Robert S Warren; Samuel Whiting; Christopher Willett; Robert A Wolff
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 11.908

2.  The Impact of Intraoperative Blood Loss on the Survival of Patients With Stage II/III Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Hiroshi Tamagawa; Toru Aoyama; Naoto Yamamoto; Mariko Kamiya; Masaaki Murakawa; Yosuke Atsumi; Masakatsu Numata; Keisuke Kazama; Kentaro Hara; Norio Yukawa; Yasushi Rino; Munetaka Masuda; Soichiro Morinaga
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Save the pylori.

Authors:  Richard H Bell
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of pylorus-preserving versus classical pancreaticoduodenectomy for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  Markus K Diener; Hanns-Peter Knaebel; Christina Heukaufer; Gerd Antes; Markus W Büchler; Christoph M Seiler
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  Delayed gastric emptying is associated with pylorus-preserving but not classical Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy: a review of the literature and critical reappraisal of the implicated pathomechanism.

Authors:  Kosmas I Paraskevas; Costas Avgerinos; Costas Manes; Dimitris Lytras; Christos Dervenis
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Therapeutic strategies for the management of delayed gastric emptying after pancreatic resection.

Authors:  Dimitrios Lytras; Kosmas I Paraskevas; Costas Avgerinos; Costas Manes; Zisis Touloumis; Konstantina D Paraskeva; Christos Dervenis
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Pancreatic resection for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Jeannine Bachmann; Christoph W Michalski; Marc E Martignoni; Markus W Büchler; Helmut Friess
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.647

8.  Antecolic gastrointestinal reconstruction with pylorus dilatation. Does it improve delayed gastric emptying after pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy?

Authors:  Konstantinos Manes; Dimitrios Lytras; Costas Avgerinos; Spiros Delis; Christos Dervenis
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 9.  Evidence-based pancreatic head resection for pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis.

Authors:  Markus Schäfer; Beat Müllhaupt; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Clinical and pathologic prognostic factors for curative resection for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  M V Perini; A L Montagnini; J Jukemura; S Penteado; E E Abdo; R Patzina; I Cecconello; J E M Cunha
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.647

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.