Literature DB >> 1107683

Who responds to sugar pills?

C G Moertel, W F Taylor, A Roth, F A Tyce.   

Abstract

Among 288 cancer patients undergoing controlled trials of oral analgesics there were 112 who received 50% or greater pain relief from placebo formulations. Patients who responded to placebo had a greater response rate to active drugs. They also had a higher incidence of central nervous system side effects to placebo. Patient groups showing as increased placebo response included those with a high level of education, farmers, those with a professional occupation, women working outside the home, and patients who were widowed, separated, or divorced. Those resistant to placebo were patients with a low educational level, unskilled workers, housewives, married women without children, and smokers. It is theorized that placebo response is a type of autohypnosis phenomenon resulting from exaggerated oral-dependency needs. Particularly vulnerable to placebo effect is the very self-sufficient individual with heavy responsibilities who is thrust into the unaccustomed dependency of disabling illness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1976        PMID: 1107683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  8 in total

1.  Role of pain in placebo analgesia.

Authors:  J D Levine; N C Gordon; J C Bornstein; H L Fields
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Use and abuse of antibiotics.

Authors:  J M Hamilton-Miller
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  A double blind, multicentre, placebo controlled trial of lornoxicam in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip and knee.

Authors:  H Berry; H A Bird; C Black; D R Blake; A M Freeman; D N Golding; E B Hamilton; M I Jayson; B Kidd; H Kohn
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Conditioned pharmacotherapeutic effects: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Robert Ader; Mary Gail Mercurio; James Walton; Deborra James; Michael Davis; Valerie Ojha; Alexa Boer Kimball; David Fiorentino
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 4.312

5.  Superstition predicts favorable weight change in an open-placebo trial: a prospective study.

Authors:  Nino Rekhviashvili; Sumati Gupta
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2014-11-22       Impact factor: 4.652

Review 6.  The problems and pitfalls of NSAID therapy in the elderly (Part II).

Authors:  A G Johnson; R O Day
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 7.  A guide to the pharmacology of placebos.

Authors:  C W Gowdey
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1983-04-15       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  A new paradigm for the prediction of antidepressant treatment response.

Authors:  Andrew F Leuchter; Ian A Cook; Aimee M Hunter; Alexander S Korb
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.986

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.