Literature DB >> 11076646

The role of tumour markers in improving the accuracy of conventional chest X-ray and liver echography in the post-operative detection of thoracic and liver metastases from breast cancer.

A Nicolini1, A Carpi, P Ferrari, L Anselmi, C Spinelli, M Conte, P Miccoli.   

Abstract

The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the value of a serum tumour marker panel in selecting from among the patients with equivocal chest X-ray (CXR) or liver echography (LE) those with thoracic or liver metastases respectively. Between January 1984 and December 1999, 467 (341 non-relapsed and 126 metastatic) breast cancer patients were followed-up postoperatively. Among the 126 metastatic patients 36 showed thoracic (19 patients) or liver (17 patients) metastases, alone or in conjunction with other organs as the first evidence of distant spread. We focused on this series of 377 patients including 341 non-relapsed plus 36 with liver or thoracic metastases. The patients were followed-up after mastectomy with serial determinations of a panel of CEA-TPA-CA15.3 tumour markers, bone scintigraphy, CXR and LE. Up to December 1999, equivocal CXR occurred in 23 (6.1%) patients of whom 11 (47.8%) developed thoracic metastases; 14 (3.7%) patients showed an equivocal LE of whom 5 developed liver metastases. In the 37 patients with equivocal CXR or equivocal LE prolonged clinical and imaging follow-up over 41 +/- 36 months (mean +/- SD, range 3-163) was used to ascertain the presence or absence of thoracic or liver metastases. In the 23 patients with equivocal CXR the negative and positive predictive values of the tumour marker panel to predict thoracic metastases were 92% and 100% respectively. In the 14 patients with equivocal LE the negative and positive predictive values of the tumour marker panel for prediction of liver metastases were 90% and 100% respectively. This study shows that in breast cancer patients the CEA-TPA-CA15.3 tumour marker panel has a high value for selecting those patients at high risk of developing clinically evident pulmonary or liver metastases from amongst those subjects with equivocal CXR or equivocal LE. Copyright 2000 Cancer Research Campaign.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11076646      PMCID: PMC2363419          DOI: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  16 in total

1.  A minimalist policy for breast cancer surveillance.

Authors:  D V Schapira; N Urban
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-01-16       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Postoperative follow-up of breast cancer patients: overview and progress in the use of tumor markers.

Authors:  A Nicolini; A Carpi
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug

3.  The limited value of routine chest X-ray in the follow-up of stage II breast cancer.

Authors:  V B Løgager; A Vestergaard; J Herrstedt; H S Thomsen; K Zedeler; P Dombernowsky
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  A rational postoperative follow-up with carcinoembryonic antigen, tissue polypeptide antigen, and urinary hydroxyproline in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  A Nicolini; A Carpi; G Di Marco; L Giuliani; R Giordani; S Palla
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1989-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Follow-up of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  J Horton
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1984-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Symptomatology as an indicator of recurrent or metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  D P Winchester; S F Sener; J D Khandekar; M A Oviedo; M P Cunningham; J A Caprini; F E Burkett; E F Scanlon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Follow-up after stage II breast cancer: a comparative study of relapsed versus nonrelapsed patients.

Authors:  H B Muss; M J McNamara; R A Connelly
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 2.339

8.  A retrospective study of earliest indicators of recurrence in patients on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group adjuvant chemotherapy trials for breast cancer. A preliminary report.

Authors:  K J Pandya; E T McFadden; L A Kalish; D C Tormey; S G Taylor; G Falkson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1985-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  The role of chest X-ray in the follow-up of primary breast cancer.

Authors:  S Ciatto; A Herd-Smith
Journal:  Tumori       Date:  1983-04-30

10.  The role of tumour markers in predicting skeletal metastases in breast cancer patients with equivocal bone scintigraphy.

Authors:  A Nicolini; P Ferrari; A Sagripanti; A Carpi
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  6 in total

1.  Intensive post-operative follow-up of breast cancer patients with tumour markers: CEA, TPA or CA15.3 vs MCA and MCA-CA15.3 vs CEA-TPA-CA15.3 panel in the early detection of distant metastases.

Authors:  Andrea Nicolini; Gianna Tartarelli; Angelo Carpi; Maria Rita Metelli; Paola Ferrari; Loretta Anselmi; Massimo Conte; Piero Berti; Paolo Miccoli
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 2.  Usefulness of traditional serum biomarkers for management of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Peppino Mirabelli; Mariarosaria Incoronato
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Evaluation of contrast Sonazoid-enhanced ultrasonography for the detection of hepatic metastases in breast cancer.

Authors:  Mai Mishima; Uhi Toh; Nobutaka Iwakuma; Miki Takenaka; Mina Furukawa; Yoshito Akagi
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 4.239

4.  The association of five preoperative serum tumor markers and pathological features in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Mingjian Lian; Cuixia Zhang; Dongdong Zhang; Ping Chen; Huijing Yang; Yuanyuan Yang; Shidong Chen; Guolin Hong
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 2.352

5.  An individual reference limit of the serum CEA-TPA-CA 15-3 tumor marker panel in the surveillance of asymptomatic women following surgery for primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Andrea Nicolini; Angelo Carpi; Paola Ferrari; Riccardo Morganti; Valentina Mazzotti; Vivian Barak; Michael J Duffy
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 3.989

6.  CA15-3 is a useful serum tumor marker for diagnostic integration of hybrid positron emission tomography with integrated computed tomography during follow-up of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Mariarosaria Incoronato; Peppino Mirabelli; Onofrio Catalano; Marco Aiello; Chiara Parente; Andrea Soricelli; Emanuele Nicolai
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 4.430

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.