Literature DB >> 11075942

Amprenavir in combination with lamivudine and zidovudine versus lamivudine and zidovudine alone in HIV-1-infected antiretroviral-naive adults. Amprenavir PROAB3001 International Study Team.

J C Goodgame1, J C Pottage, H Jablonowski, W D Hardy, A Stein, M Fischl, P Morrow, J Feinberg, C H Brothers, I Vafidis, P Nacci, J Yeo, L Pedneault.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the antiviral activity and safety of a new protease inhibitor, amprenavir (141W94) in combination with lamivudine and zidovudine, versus lamivudine and zidovudine alone in HIV-1 infected, antiretroviral-naive subjects.
DESIGN: Subjects (n=232) with a CD4 T cell count of > or =200 cells/mm3, plasma HIV-1 RNA levels of > or =10000 copies/ml, and < or =4 weeks of prior nucleoside antiretroviral therapy, were stratified according to baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA level (10000-30000; 30000-100000; or >100000 copies/ml). Subjects received double-blind treatment with either 1200 mg amprenavir twice daily in combination with lamivudine (150 mg twice daily) and zidovudine (300 mg twice daily) (amprenavir/lamivudine/zidovudine) or matched placebo, lamivudine and zidovudine for 16 weeks. Thereafter, subjects with confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA levels of > or =400 copies/ml could add open-label amprenavir or switch to other antiretrovirals and continue treatment for up to a minimum of 48 weeks. The primary endpoint of the study was defined as the proportion of subjects with plasma HIV-1 RNA of <400 copies/ml at 48 weeks.
RESULTS: At 48 weeks, a significantly greater proportion of amprenavir/lamivudine/zidovudine subjects had plasma HIV-1 RNA levels <400 copies/ml than lamivudine/ zidovudine subjects in the overall population: 41 versus 3% (intent-to-treat missing equals failure analysis) (P<0.001); 93 versus 42% (as-treated analysis) (P<0.001); and within each of the three randomization strata (P<0.001). Subjects on amprenavir/lamivudine/zidovudine experienced longer time to event (permanent discontinuation of randomized therapy or viral rebound) than those on lamivudine/zidovudine (median of 33 versus 13 weeks; P<0.001). A significantly greater incidence of drug-related nausea, vomiting, rash and oral/perioral paresthesia was observed with amprenavir/lamivudine/zidovudine than with lamivudine/zidovudine.
CONCLUSIONS: Amprenavir, in combination with lamivudine and zidovudine, has potent and durable antiviral activity in antiretroviral-naive subjects over 48 weeks. Amprenavir was safe and generally well tolerated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11075942

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antivir Ther        ISSN: 1359-6535


  7 in total

1.  Effect of the HIV protease inhibitor amprenavir on the growth and differentiation of primary gingival epithelium.

Authors:  Mohd Israr; Danielle Mitchell; Samina Alam; Donald Dinello; Joseph J Kishel; Craig Meyers
Journal:  Antivir Ther       Date:  2010

2.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence for increasing numbers of drugs in antiretroviral combination therapy.

Authors:  Rachel Jordan; Lisa Gold; Carole Cummins; Chris Hyde
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-30

Review 3.  Amprenavir or fosamprenavir plus ritonavir in HIV infection: pharmacology, efficacy and tolerability profile.

Authors:  Cédric Arvieux; Olivier Tribut
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  HIV protease inhibitors block oral epithelial cell DNA synthesis.

Authors:  Robert J Danaher; Chunmei Wang; Andrew T Roland; Charlotte S Kaetzel; Richard N Greenberg; Craig S Miller
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 2.633

5.  Twice-daily amprenavir 1200 mg versus amprenavir 600 mg/ritonavir 100 mg, in combination with at least 2 other antiretroviral drugs, in HIV-1-infected patients.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Nadler; Joseph C Gathe; Richard B Pollard; Gary J Richmond; Qiming Liao; Sandy Griffith; C Tracey Lancaster; Jaime E Hernandez; Keith A Pappa
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2003-06-10       Impact factor: 3.090

6.  Comparison of epigenetic profiles of human oral epithelial cells from HIV-positive (on HAART) and HIV-negative subjects.

Authors:  Santosh K Ghosh; Thomas S McCormick; Betty L Eapen; Elizabeth Yohannes; Mark R Chance; Aaron Weinberg
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 4.528

7.  Cloud infrastructures for in silico drug discovery: economic and practical aspects.

Authors:  Daniele D'Agostino; Andrea Clematis; Alfonso Quarati; Daniele Cesini; Federica Chiappori; Luciano Milanesi; Ivan Merelli
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.