Literature DB >> 11075715

Fish shoal composition: mechanisms and constraints.

J Krause1, D J Hoare, D Croft, J Lawrence, A Ward, G D Ruxton, J G Godin, R James.   

Abstract

Observations were made on three fish species (banded killifish (Fundulus diaphanus), golden shiner (Notemigonus crysoleucas) and white sucker (Catostomus commersoni)) in a temperate lake (New Brunswick, Canada) in order to investigate the relationship between shoal choice behaviour of individual fishes and shoal composition. Encounters between shoals were observed to take place every 1.1 min per shoal and an encounter lasted 3.7 s on average. The duration of shoal encounters was influenced by shoal size but not by differences between shoals in either body length or species. Conversely, the outcome of shoal encounters (i.e. ences between shoals in either body length or species. Conversely, the outcome of shoal encounters (i.e. whether or not an individual changes shoal) was influenced by body length and species differences but not by shoal size. Together, these results suggest that encounter duration itself is unlikely to have an important influence on encounter outcome. The collection of ten entire fish shoals showed that they were assorted by species and body length. A simulation model demonstrated that individual shoal choice behaviour alone could account for the generation and maintenance of the observed levels of size assortedness of shoals without invoking the existence of other sorting mechanisms such as differential swimming speeds. However, the generation of species assortedness was not predicted by the model. Furthermore, our data suggest that fish density acts as a constraint on shoal choice, influencing both shoal size and composition. This work has implications for studies on information transfer and reciprocal altruism within populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11075715      PMCID: PMC1690773          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  5 in total

1.  The importance of stable schooling: do familiar sticklebacks stick together?

Authors:  L Barber; G D Ruxton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Shoaling generates social learning of foraging information in guppies

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.844

3.  Temporal prey distribution affects the competitive ability of parasitized sticklebacks.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.844

4.  Foraging innovation in the guppy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.844

5.  Persistent transient myocardial ischemia despite beta-adrenergic blockade predicts a higher risk of adverse cardiac events in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  T Madjlessi-Simon; M Mary-Krause; F Fillette; P Lechat; P Jaillon
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 24.094

  5 in total
  17 in total

1.  Ontogeny of collective behavior reveals a simple attraction rule.

Authors:  Robert C Hinz; Gonzalo G de Polavieja
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Assessment and assortment: how fishes use local and global cues to choose which school to go to.

Authors:  Ashley J W Ward; Paul J B Hart; Jens Krause
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Both prey and predator features predict the individual predation risk and survival of schooling prey.

Authors:  Jolle Wolter Jolles; Matthew M G Sosna; Geoffrey P F Mazué; Colin R Twomey; Joseph Bak-Coleman; Daniel I Rubenstein; Iain D Couzin
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 8.713

4.  Predator-prey encounter rates in freshwater piscivores: effects of prey density and water transparency.

Authors:  Håkan Turesson; Christer Brönmark
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-04-24       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Association patterns and shoal fidelity in the three-spined stickleback.

Authors:  Ashley J W Ward; Marc S Botham; Daniel J Hoare; Richard James; Mark Broom; Jean-Guy J Godin; Jens Krause
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Group dynamics of zebra and wildebeest in a woodland savanna: effects of predation risk and habitat density.

Authors:  Maria Thaker; Abi T Vanak; Cailey R Owen; Monika B Ogden; Rob Slotow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Diffusion and topological neighbours in flocks of starlings: relating a model to empirical data.

Authors:  Charlotte K Hemelrijk; Hanno Hildenbrandt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Schooling fish under attack are not all equal: some lead, others follow.

Authors:  Stefano Marras; Paolo Domenici
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  NEIGHBOUR-IN: Image processing software for spatial analysis of animal grouping.

Authors:  Yves Caubet; Freddie-Jeanne Richard
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 1.546

10.  Leadership in moving human groups.

Authors:  Margarete Boos; Johannes Pritz; Simon Lange; Michael Belz
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.