Literature DB >> 11074472

Comparative quantification of diverse serotypes of HIV-1 in plasma from a diverse population of patients.

J R Clarke1, S Galpin, R Braganza, A Ashraf, R Russell, D R Churchill, J N Weber, M O McClure.   

Abstract

HIV-1 is characterised by extensive genetic variability encompassing at least 10 different phylogenetically related clades within the major group of HIV-1 subtypes. Most commercially available HIV-1 RNA plasma viral load assays have been optimised with clade B viruses and may yield misleadingly low RNA levels for nonclade B viruses that are increasingly found in Europe. In this study we compare the most recent versions of the Roche Amplicor HIV Monitor and the Chiron Quantiplex for ability to detect viraemia in a population of patients infected with a range of HIV-1 subtypes. EDTA-treated plasma was obtained from 206 patients. The Amplicor and Quantiplex assays were carried out in accordance with manufacturers' instructions. Results from 53/206 (25.7%) samples differed by >0.4 log between Amplicor 1.5 and Quantiplex 3.0. A >0.5 log and 1.0 log difference was detected between Amplicor 1.5 and Quantiplex 3.0 in 37/206 (17.9%) and 7/206 (3.4%) of samples, respectively. Overall, Amplicor 1.5 gave a median value of 0.22 log higher than Quantiplex 3.0. Discordant results were detected in 53 out of 206 (25.7%) samples. Of these 22 out of 123 (17.9%) samples were of UK origin, 18 out of 43 (41.9%) African, 1 out of 8 (12.5%) South American, 1 out of 6 (16.7%) North American, 4 out of 9 (44.4%) North European, 3 out of 11 (23.7%) South European and 3 out of 7 (42.3%) Asian samples, respectively. Serotyping revealed that discordant viral load results between Amplicor 1.5 and Quantiplex 3.0 occurred within samples from all subtypes (A-E). Despite the improvements made to both the Roche Amplicor and the Chiron Quantiplex assays discordant results were detected between the two assays in 25.7% of cases. In a substantial minority of patients there were major discrepancies between the two assays that were not explained by HIV subtype differences. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11074472     DOI: 10.1002/1096-9071(200012)62:4<445::aid-jmv8>3.0.co;2-n

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Virol        ISSN: 0146-6615            Impact factor:   2.327


  4 in total

1.  Impact of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) genetic diversity on performance of four commercial viral load assays: LCx HIV RNA Quantitative, AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR v1.5, VERSANT HIV-1 RNA 3.0, and NucliSens HIV-1 QT.

Authors:  Priscilla Swanson; Carmen de Mendoza; Yagnya Joshi; Alan Golden; Richard L Hodinka; Vincent Soriano; Sushil G Devare; John Hackett
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparison of the RealTime HIV-1, COBAS TaqMan 48 v1.0, Easy Q v1.2, and Versant v3.0 assays for determination of HIV-1 viral loads in a cohort of Canadian patients with diverse HIV subtype infections.

Authors:  Deirdre Church; Daniel Gregson; Tracie Lloyd; Marina Klein; Brenda Beckthold; Kevin Laupland; M John Gill
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Sequencing assays for failed genotyping with the versant hepatitis C virus genotype assay (LiPA), version 2.0.

Authors:  Sylvie Larrat; Jean-Dominique Poveda; Camille Coudret; Katia Fusillier; Nelly Magnat; Anne Signori-Schmuck; Vincent Thibault; Patrice Morand
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Systematic review of the performance of HIV viral load technologies on plasma samples.

Authors:  Kimberly A Sollis; Pieter W Smit; Susan Fiscus; Nathan Ford; Marco Vitoria; Shaffiq Essajee; David Barnett; Ben Cheng; Suzanne M Crowe; Thomas Denny; Alan Landay; Wendy Stevens; Vincent Habiyambere; Jos Perrins; Rosanna W Peeling
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.